Teaching talk:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 03 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
(translated the content to english)
Line 1: Line 1:
* Einige Ideen zur Verbesserung mal aufgeschrieben nach durcharbeitung des PDF-Dokumentes ([[User:UE-InfoVis0910 0526452|UE-InfoVis0910 0526452]] 12:21, 10 November 2009 (CET)):
* some ideas for improvements written down after reading the PDF-file ([[User:UE-InfoVis0910 0526452|UE-InfoVis0910 0526452]] 12:21, 10 November 2009 (CET)):
** Farben erstmal weg
** remove colors for now
** Einheitliche Schriftart
** one consistent font
** Tabellenteilungen nachbearteiten
** rework on table layout
** Born, Died, Died% weg??
** remove "Born", "Died", "Died%" columns??
** Bessere Anordnung notwendig
** better arrangement necessary
** Chickens (Eggs) weg??
** remove Chickens (Eggs)??
** Was mach ma mit den Verweisen?
** what to do with the references?
** eventuell slaught. auch weg da es ja nur um getötetes Tiere geht?
** probalbly also remove "slaught.", beacause tha table should be about killed animals?
<br/>
*ideen 2 [[User:UE-InfoVis0910 0308394|UE-InfoVis0910 0308394]] 11:14, 11 November 2009 (CET):
** zwischenraum ist die beste form der gruppierung, wenn genug platz vorhanden (jahre)
** mehr zwischenraum zwischen den zeilen
** linien nur zur besseren abtrennung (zb total)
** umramungen nicht nötig
** kategorien (jahre) von links nach rechts (wie sie sind)
** übergruppen (jahre vs. slaugh./born) sollen linksbündig sein? widerrufen auf seite 19
** schwieriger punkt: Don’t vary the structure of the table from group to group. For instance, each group should contain the same columns, in the same order, with the same widths;
** % zeichen in den zellen
** zu vergleichende spalten gleich nebeneinander
** sortinerung sollte chronologisch sein
** alphabetical order nützlich für listen die keine logische sortierung haben
** anderer ansatz ist nach "häufigkeit" bzw. relevanz der einzelnen datensätze
** mit 0ern auffüllen nach der kommastelle um alles auf die gleiche linie zu bringen
** lables der spalten gleich mit dem inhalt alignen (rechts wenn zahlen)
** unnötige genauigkeit vermeiden (vorletzte spalten)
** evtl auf ganze (millionen) runden? wenn ja im header dazu schreiben
** datum "lesbar" formatieren
** details (died) in mittlerer sektion evtl. mit grauer schrift "unwichtiger" machen


Fragen:
* some more ideas for improvements ([[User:UE-InfoVis0910 0308394|UE-InfoVis0910 0308394]] 11:14, 11 November 2009 (CET)):
* Warum Werte in "Killed 2007" fett formatiert? Aktuellste Daten oder eigentliche Aussage der Tabelle?
** blank space is the best form of grouping, if enough space available (years)
* Sollten die Daten, die aus der Quelle [f] stammen in der Tabelle überhaupt berücjsichtigt werden? Laut Beschreibung keine konkreten Daten, sondern lediglich Spekulationen! ([[User:UE-InfoVis0910 0201040|UE-InfoVis0910 0201040]])
** add more horzontal space between the rows
** lines only for better seperation (e.g. "total")
** outlines for table not necessary
** categories (years) from left to the right (as they are)
** don’t vary the structure of the table from group to group
** %-signs in the cells
** arrange colums that shall be compared next to each other
** alphabetical order for lists with no "natural" order
** an other approach: sort by relavance (occurrence) of the datasets (rows)
** fill up with 0's after the comma sign to get the values well aligned
** align labels like the data in the table (to the right if numbers)
** reduce unnecessary precision (last columns)
** round to whole millions? if yes, note it in the headline
** format date "readable"
** reduce prominence of the column "died" with gray colored font
 
* questions:
** why are the values in "killed 2007" formated bold? just because they are most up-to-date or have they an essential meaning for the table?
** shall the data marked with [f] be considered in the table? as described in the reference, those are no concrete values, but asumptions based on other data! ([[User:UE-InfoVis0910 0201040|UE-InfoVis0910 0201040]])

Revision as of 22:57, 16 November 2009

  • some ideas for improvements written down after reading the PDF-file (UE-InfoVis0910 0526452 12:21, 10 November 2009 (CET)):
    • remove colors for now
    • one consistent font
    • rework on table layout
    • remove "Born", "Died", "Died%" columns??
    • better arrangement necessary
    • remove Chickens (Eggs)??
    • what to do with the references?
    • probalbly also remove "slaught.", beacause tha table should be about killed animals?
  • some more ideas for improvements (UE-InfoVis0910 0308394 11:14, 11 November 2009 (CET)):
    • blank space is the best form of grouping, if enough space available (years)
    • add more horzontal space between the rows
    • lines only for better seperation (e.g. "total")
    • outlines for table not necessary
    • categories (years) from left to the right (as they are)
    • don’t vary the structure of the table from group to group
    • %-signs in the cells
    • arrange colums that shall be compared next to each other
    • alphabetical order for lists with no "natural" order
    • an other approach: sort by relavance (occurrence) of the datasets (rows)
    • fill up with 0's after the comma sign to get the values well aligned
    • align labels like the data in the table (to the right if numbers)
    • reduce unnecessary precision (last columns)
    • round to whole millions? if yes, note it in the headline
    • format date "readable"
    • reduce prominence of the column "died" with gray colored font
  • questions:
    • why are the values in "killed 2007" formated bold? just because they are most up-to-date or have they an essential meaning for the table?
    • shall the data marked with [f] be considered in the table? as described in the reference, those are no concrete values, but asumptions based on other data! (UE-InfoVis0910 0201040)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/w/index.php?title=Teaching_talk:TUW_-_UE_InfoVis_WS_2009/10_-_Gruppe_03_-_Aufgabe_2&oldid=23254"