Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 03 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (80.108.72.221 => UE-InfoVis0910 0308394)
(Import new tables)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Aufgabenstellung ==
== Aufgabenstellung ==
[http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/infovis_ue_aufgabe2.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2]
[http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/infovis_ue_aufgabe2.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2]
=== Zu beurteilende Tabelle ===
=== Zu beurteilende Tabelle => [http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php?title=Image:AnimalsKilledforFood7S.jpg Link] ===
[[Image:AnimalsKilledforFood7S.jpg|800px]]


=== critic view on the table ===
=== critic view on the table ===
Line 15: Line 14:
* the "rabbit" row is a bit dodgy, as the references [f] state, that these values are just speculations
* the "rabbit" row is a bit dodgy, as the references [f] state, that these values are just speculations


=== Revised tables ===
[[Image:InfoVisGr03Table1.jpg]]
[[Image:InfoVisGr03Table2.jpg]]
[[Image:InfoVisGr03History.jpg]]


=== improvements ===  
=== improvements ===  
* data from columns "killed" and the data connected to it are put in one table and the rest of the data (columns <strike>"born"</strike>, "slaught", "died", ...) in a seperate table
* data from columns "killed" and the data connected to it are put in one table and the rest of the data (columns <strike>"born"</strike>, "slaught", "died", ...) in a seperate table
* references to used sources are put behind the values, and made smaller, for less distraction
* references to used sources are put behind the values, and made smaller, for less distraction

Revision as of 10:42, 17 November 2009

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2

Zu beurteilende Tabelle => Link

critic view on the table

  • too much color (distracts reader from content)
  • too many grids and lines used
  • fonts aren't used consitently
  • potential insignificant content included (e.g. "born" has no clear relation to the rest of the data labeled as "number of animals killed")
  • the columns used for the different years contain different data, which makes comparison difficult, also from a spacial view
  • the columns "06/05" and "06/07" have an unclear header. they could be read as dates (06/05 -> June 2006 / June 5th). also the values of these columns (as factors) aren't very intuitive as e.g. percent values
  • the values in the table have different precision, which makes comparison more difficult
  • the values that are represented as % don't have their %-sign next to them. they could be misinterpreted if you read a row at once (without looking at the header)
  • the "rabbit" row is a bit dodgy, as the references [f] state, that these values are just speculations

Revised tables

improvements

  • data from columns "killed" and the data connected to it are put in one table and the rest of the data (columns "born", "slaught", "died", ...) in a seperate table
  • references to used sources are put behind the values, and made smaller, for less distraction
  • rows are ordered by commoness
  • columns are reordered, so connected data is easier to compare
  • blank space (instaed of lines) is used to make the tables more readable
  • lines and grids are only used were necessary
  • the precision of the values (in millions) is unified to one number after the comma, 2 numbers after the comma for % values
  • results of "06/05", "06/07" are shown as %, so meaning of the values is more clear to the reader
  • also if it's recommended to keep data that uses vales from an other colums should stay beneath each other, we decided to append the two columns "06/05" and "06/07" at the end of the table, because it relates two other columns and would worsen the readability of the table

Links