Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2007/08 - Gruppe 09 - Aufgabe 2

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Aufgabenstellung[edit]

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2

Zu beurteilende Tabelle[edit]

Critics[edit]

Structural Components of Tables[edit]

Thoughtfully designed Data and Structural Components lead to clear and efficient communication.
Tables generally work best when they also contain additional text that is used to complement the categorical subdivisions and quantitative values in various ways. In Chapter 7, General Design for Communication, we noted that additional text can do the following:
  • Label
  • Introduce
  • Explain
  • Reinforce
  • Highlight
  • Sequence
  • Recommend
  • Inquire
[Few, 2004]


The table tries to explain its data with some text.

The title of the table should be clearly seperated from the table and maybe regrouped in a title and a sub title.

It states labels for the ASSETS and the FUND columns. These column headers label the information below them and should be separated from the data with a horizontal line.

The return values are clearly grouped with the spanner header RETURN. Maybe it should be stated that this is the return on investment. Below the RETURN spanner header we find column headers which state the period for which the data is valid. These should be separated from the data with a horizontal line. Furthermore it is not absolutely clear what there meaning is, and the mixing of so different periods makes it more difficult to understand the table. For example it would be interesting which 3 year period the 3-YR column covers.

The dollar and percent signs should not be introduced at the first data line. Data definitions should be part of the column headers.

The table does not try to focus my interest to a special area, because no area is specially highlighted.


Delineating columns and rows[edit]

The design process involves several decisions regarding the layout of columns and rows to provide a structure that is easy and efficient to read and understand. Readers should be able to scan quickly through the content to find what they need and perhaps make localized comparisons of related numbers.
[Few, 2004]


Columns and rows are delineated through
  • White space
  • Rules and grids
  • Fill color
.

White space[edit]

White space is the preferred means for arraning data into columns and rows.
[Few, 2004]


It is not possible to read the rows without difficulty because the vertical white space between them is pretty small. Therefore it is recommended that the vertical white space between the rows is increased.

As well the horizontal white space between the columns should be increased to ease the reading of the columns. From my point of view, the comparison of the funds is the most interesting information in this table. To lead the reader to scan down the columns, it is advisable to pronounce the white space between the columns more than the one between the rows.

To make a clear distinction between row headers and data, the horizontal white space should be increased between these two parts. As well the horizontal white space between the ASSETS and FUND column should be increased a bit to make a clear distinction.

Rules and grids[edit]

Despite the uselessness of grids and the limited usefulness of rules to delineate columns and rows in tables, they are sometimes useful for grouping or highlighting subsets of data.
[Few, 2004]


In order to make the table more readable it is advisable to draw a line between the column headers and the data.

If the table is in its original context surrounded with some objects where there should be a clear distinction, thin lines could be drawn on each side. Remember to keep the lines as thin and light as possible.

A combination of horizontal and vertical rules could be used if there is an area of special interest.


Fill color[edit]

When white space alone can´t be used to effectively delineate columns and rows in tables, fill shades and hues work better than grids and rules.
[Few, 2004]


Following this quotation the rows of the table could be separated with fill shades. It would also be possible to delineate the headers in the table as separate groups of information in using fill colors.


Arranging data[edit]

Columns or rows[edit]

Some sequential relationships are more easily understood when they are arranged in a particular way, either horizontally from left to right or vertically from top to bottom. … We naturally think of time as moving from left to right, rather than down from top to bottom.
[Few, 2004]


Concerning the ranking relationships the table shows an easy to understand top-down ranking of funds regarding their assets in million dollars.

The time is illustrated from left to right, but the relations between the columns are not clear at all.

Groups and breaks[edit]

It is often appropriate, and perhaps even necessary, to break sets of data into smaller groups.
[Few, 2004]


Since the changing time scale of the table is confusing, I would suggest to group the data for a given time scale.

For example make a table for the year 2003 till 2007. Or make a table showing the quarters in the year 2003. Everything is possible, but it should be consistent.


Columns sequence[edit]

Columns containing sets of quantitative values that you want your readers to compare easily should be placed as close to one another as possible.
[Few, 2004]


Following this principle the table puts the values near together which should be easily comparable.

The table shows the returns in percentage and the reader can easily compare the percentages.

Data sequence[edit]

When you need to sequence numbers, their quantitative order, either ascending or descending, is the only useful way to sequence them.
[Few, 2004]


The funds are listed descending concerning their assets. Since the asset of a fund is one of the most important characteristics and the assets are listed in numbers, it is useful to list the funds in their quantitative order.




Formatting text[edit]

Orientation[edit]

As speakers of English, we are accustomed to reading language from left to right, arranged horizontally.
[Few, 2004]


The orientation of all text in the given table is optimal.

Alignment[edit]

In most cases convetions are used to determine the alignment of text. Few explains three of them as follows:

  • Numbers that represent quantitative values, as opposed to those that are merely identifiers (e.g., customer numbers), should always be aligned to the right.
  • Dates are best aligned to the left, using a format that keeps the number of characters in each portion of the date (i.e., month, day, and year) constant.
  • Text that expresses neither numbers nor dates works best when aligned to the left.
[Few, 2004]


The given table satisfies the first rule. All numbers that represent quantitive values are aligned to the right, namely the columns 'ASSETS' and 'RETURN'. Also the thrid rule is satisfied since the text in the 'FUND' column is aligned to the left.

Number and date format[edit]

  • Numbers include no unnecessary information (e.g., excessive levels of precision)
  • They express the data using the format that is most familiar to its readers.
[Few, 2004]


The number format of the given table is very good. There is a comma to the left of the first three whole-number digits in the 'ASSETS' column. Also in the 'RETURN' column alls positive and negative values are tagged by a + or a - sign. But there is a small shortcoming: The % and $ sign is only shown once in every column. This should be placed immediately next to every dollar or percentage value.

Number and date precision[edit]

The level of precision should not exceed the level needed to server your communication objectives and the needs of your readers.
[Few, 2004]


The level of precision in the 'ASSETS' column is a little bit too high. The first two digits do not communicate very important information. When talking about 20- to 70-thousand dollars, fifty dollars more less don't make a noteworthy difference.

Fonts[edit]

  • The font should be as legible as possible
  • The same font should be used throughout.
[Few, 2004]


For the given table the second rule isnt true for the whole graphic. In the 'FUND' column there fontsize seems to differ between the different rows.

Emphasis[edit]

Emphasis such as bolding or italicizing is missing completely in this table.


Summarizing values[edit]

Summary values give your readers an overview in a single glance, and if they wish, they can then dig into the detailed values. This is a very powerful path to understanding, moving from general to specific, macroscopic to microscopic, summary to detail.
[Few, 2004]


This table currently does not contain any summarizing values.

Column summary values[edit]

A value that aggregates an entire column of values is a column summary, which generally appears in a separate row beneath the last row of detailed values.
[Few, 2004]


For each column under the 'RETURN' spanner header it could be useful to provide the median of gain/loss values. It is unclear though, whether this information is desirable at all (due to lack of domain knowledge).

Row summary values[edit]

A value that aggregates an entire row of values is a row summary, which generally appears in a separate column to the right of the last column of detailed values.
[Few, 2004]


The detailed values in columns beneath the 'RETURN' spanner header seem to be cumulative across a row (Assumption based on the cryptic column titles). That is why there doesn't seem to be much sense in providing a separate summary values for each row (i.e for each fund).

Group summary values[edit]

Group summary values [..] summarize meaningful subsets of values rather than the entire set of values throughout the column or row.
[Few, 2004]


Given only the information provided in the table, there is no plausible grouping possible. The only possible grouping, using only the provided data, would be one by intervals of assets (in Millions of Dollars) or gain/loss percentage intervals. However (possibly due to our lack of domain knowledge) these groupings don't seem reasonable.

Header versus footers[edit]

When the summary values are more important to your message or to your readers than the details, and placing them below the details would make them harder and less efficient to find, it often makes sense to place them in headers even though this is less conventional.
[Few, 2004]


In our case the summary values denote complementary information, therefore their position in the footer seems appropriate.

Page information[edit]

Because of short-term memory constraints, effective table design requires that certain information be repeated on each new page. Otherwise, your readers may lose track of information that they need to interpret the table as they move from page to page.
[Few, 2004]


Our table is not split into multiple pages, therefore this aspect is not applicable here.

Repeated column headers[edit]

When tables extend onto multiple pages, the columns are no longer labeled after the first page unless you repeat the column headers on each.
[Few, 2004]


The proper way of handling tables spreading across multiple pages would be to copy the table headers on top of each page. However, in our case this is not necessary.

Repeated row headers[edit]

[...] even those of us who are careful to repeat column headers on each page seldom think to repeat the row headers as well, yet the problem is the same.
[Few, 2004]


This principle is applicable when multiple rows, which spread across multiple pages, are grouped together and have one title column where the title printed only for the first row of the group. The correct way of designing such a table would be to re-print the title on the first row on each page. Again, this is of no concern to our table here.

Improved Table[edit]


The appearance of the table as a whole has been improved. White space between the columns has been added to improve the tables readability. Furthermore the labels have been separated from the data by using horzontal lines. Also the format of all text (fontsize) and the format of the numbers have been set to a consistant value. The only remaining problem is the labeling of the four 'RETURN' columns. Since we didnt have access to any meta information it wasnt possible to determine the exact meaning of these four labels and so we could not improve this deficiency of this table.

References[edit]

[Few, 2004] Stephen Few, Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten, Analytics Press, 2004, Chapter 8 - Table Design.

Links[edit]