Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 02 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
=== Zu beurteilende Tabelle ===
=== Zu beurteilende Tabelle ===
[[Image:20_e-edition_table01.gif]]
[[Image:20_e-edition_table01.gif]]
===Critics concerning the table ===
===Critics concerning the table ===
* Dummy.
 
* The background colour is useless and disturbing.
* 'Frequency' is almost always the same, doesn't need to be an own column.
* 2007 and 2006 should be switched to be increasing.
* The columns don't seem to belong to each oterh -> lines should be marked as groups via colour or space.
* The percentage is not always correct.
* Increase and Decrease are not marked in different colours.
* Increases should be marked with +.
* '***' is unconvenient for missing data.
* There exists no ranking number.
* The States are embedded in the Newspaper name, should be separated.
 
 
===Corrected table ===
===Corrected table ===
[[Image:InfoVis Gr2 Tab.jpg|700px]]
[[Image:InfoVis Gr2 Tab.jpg|700px]]

Revision as of 09:52, 16 November 2009

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2

Zu beurteilende Tabelle

Critics concerning the table

  • The background colour is useless and disturbing.
  • 'Frequency' is almost always the same, doesn't need to be an own column.
  • 2007 and 2006 should be switched to be increasing.
  • The columns don't seem to belong to each oterh -> lines should be marked as groups via colour or space.
  • The percentage is not always correct.
  • Increase and Decrease are not marked in different colours.
  • Increases should be marked with +.
  • '***' is unconvenient for missing data.
  • There exists no ranking number.
  • The States are embedded in the Newspaper name, should be separated.


Corrected table


Links