Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 09 - Aufgabe 2

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2

Zu beurteilende Tabelle

Links

Critics on the table

  • Table borders are not needed since they contain no additional information.
  • Label of the table is missing, so the whole statistics is hard to understand.
  • Table rows contain different information and units, e.g. "Sold", "On the market" and "Change".
  • Units (% and $) within the table cells are bad formatted. Could be extracted and written to table headers.
  • Some units are explizitly displayed (% and $), others not even defined (last column).
  • Dimensions of table columns are not properly assigned. Last column is far to wide, others are to short (or bad formatted).
  • Header information of first column is used in table cells again.
  • Numbers are aligned left, so they are hardly comparable and readable.
  • The serparator of numbers (in table column "units") is missing. Not consistent through whole statistics.
  • Precision of numbers is not constistent as well.
  • Confusing naming of table cells, e.g. "Change 2007-2008" references change from March 2007 to March 2008.
  • Missing percentages for Change from March 2007 to March 2008.

Optimized Table

Improvements

  • Fill in.