Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 09 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
=== Critics on the table ===
=== Critics on the table ===


*Table borders are not needed since they contain no additional information.
*Table borders are not necessary since they provide no additional information.
*Label of the table is missing, so the whole statistics is hard to understand.
*Since there is no table labeling, the whole statistics is hard to understand.
*Table rows contain different information and units, e.g. "Sold", "On the market" and "Change".
*Table rows contain different types of information, e.g. "Sold", "On the market" and "Change".
*Units (% and $) within the table cells are bad formatted. Could be extracted and written to table headers.
*Units (% and $) within the table cells are badly formatted. Those could be extracted and written into the table header.
*Some units are explizitly displayed (% and $), others not even defined (last column).
*Some units are explicitly displayed (% and $), others not even defined (last column).
*Dimensions of table columns are not properly assigned. Last column is far to wide, others are to short (or bad formatted).
*The Dimensions of the table columns are not properly assigned. While the last column is far too wide, others are too short.
*Header information of first column is used in table cells again.
*Header information of the first column is used in table cells again.
*Numbers are aligned left, so they are hardly comparable and readable.
*Numbers are aligned left, hence they are hardly comparable and readable.
*The serparator of numbers (in table column "units") is missing. Not consistent through whole statistics.
*The serparator of numbers (in table column "units") is missing. Not consistent through whole statistics.
*Precision of numbers is not constistent as well.
*Precision of numbers is not constistent as well.

Revision as of 00:35, 22 November 2008

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2

Zu beurteilende Tabelle

Links

Critics on the table

  • Table borders are not necessary since they provide no additional information.
  • Since there is no table labeling, the whole statistics is hard to understand.
  • Table rows contain different types of information, e.g. "Sold", "On the market" and "Change".
  • Units (% and $) within the table cells are badly formatted. Those could be extracted and written into the table header.
  • Some units are explicitly displayed (% and $), others not even defined (last column).
  • The Dimensions of the table columns are not properly assigned. While the last column is far too wide, others are too short.
  • Header information of the first column is used in table cells again.
  • Numbers are aligned left, hence they are hardly comparable and readable.
  • The serparator of numbers (in table column "units") is missing. Not consistent through whole statistics.
  • Precision of numbers is not constistent as well.
  • Confusing naming of table cells, e.g. "Change 2007-2008" references change from March 2007 to March 2008.
  • Missing percentages for Change from March 2007 to March 2008.

Optimized Table

Improvements

  • Fill in.
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/w/index.php?title=Teaching:TUW_-_UE_InfoVis_WS_2008/09_-_Gruppe_09_-_Aufgabe_2&oldid=20349"