Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 09 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: == Aufgabenstellung == [http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws08/infovis_ue_aufgabe2.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2] === Zu beurteilende Tabelle === [[Image:Statis...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*[[Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 09|Gruppe 09]] | *[[Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 09|Gruppe 09]] | ||
=== Critics on the table === | |||
*Table borders are not needed since they contain no additional information. | |||
*Label of the table is missing, so the whole statistics is hard to understand. | |||
*Table rows contain different information and units, e.g. "Sold", "On the market" and "Change". | |||
*Units (% and $) within the table cells are bad formatted. Could be extracted and written to table headers. | |||
*Some units are explizitly displayed (% and $), others not even defined (last column). | |||
*Dimensions of table columns are not properly assigned. Last column is far to wide, others are to short (or bad formatted). | |||
*Header information of first column is used in table cells again. | |||
*Numbers are aligned left, so they are hardly comparable and readable. | |||
*The serparator of numbers (in table column "units") is missing. Not consistent through whole statistics. | |||
*Precision of numbers is not constistent as well. | |||
*Confusing naming of table cells, e.g. "Change 2007-2008" references change from March 2007 to March 2008. | |||
*Missing percentages for Change from March 2007 to March 2008. | |||
Revision as of 00:22, 22 November 2008
Aufgabenstellung
Zu beurteilende Tabelle
Links
Critics on the table
- Table borders are not needed since they contain no additional information.
- Label of the table is missing, so the whole statistics is hard to understand.
- Table rows contain different information and units, e.g. "Sold", "On the market" and "Change".
- Units (% and $) within the table cells are bad formatted. Could be extracted and written to table headers.
- Some units are explizitly displayed (% and $), others not even defined (last column).
- Dimensions of table columns are not properly assigned. Last column is far to wide, others are to short (or bad formatted).
- Header information of first column is used in table cells again.
- Numbers are aligned left, so they are hardly comparable and readable.
- The serparator of numbers (in table column "units") is missing. Not consistent through whole statistics.
- Precision of numbers is not constistent as well.
- Confusing naming of table cells, e.g. "Change 2007-2008" references change from March 2007 to March 2008.
- Missing percentages for Change from March 2007 to March 2008.