Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 03 - Aufgabe 1 - Chernoff Face: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 19: Line 19:


== Critics ==
== Critics ==
Chernoff faces may are not that effective as it seems. Certain features like the perception of eye size, eyebrow slant and the combination of those both are more influencing for longer viewing times than others. Therefore [Morris et. al, 2000] came to the conclusion that the use of Chernoff faces ''"may not have a significant advantage over other iconic visualization techniques for multidimensional information visualization.”''
Chernoff faces are not always the best solution for visualizing of multidimensional information. Certain features like the perception of eye size, eyebrow slant and the combination of those both are more influencing for longer viewing times than others. Therefore [Morris et. al, 2000] came to the conclusion that the use of Chernoff faces ''"may not have a significant advantage over other iconic visualization techniques for multidimensional information visualization.”''





Latest revision as of 23:10, 22 November 2009

Introduction[edit]

Chernoff faces display multivariate data in the shape of a human face.
[Wikipedia, 2009]


Instead of using a vector representation for describing sets of data, a vector is represented by a face which can hold up to 18 dimensions. Changes of vectors result in different faces, which the human brain can treat better than vectors. Chernoff faces are often used in statistic presentations as Figure 1 shows.

Fig. 1: Life in Los Angeles
[Turner, 1977]
These faces are a type of glyph, a graphical object whose properties represent data values.
[Kosara, 2007]


The idea of displaying faces to represent multivariate data was first published in 1973 in The Journal of American National Statistic by Herman Chernoff who was born in 1923 in America.


The idea in detail[edit]

Chernoff faces are simplified faces that can help viewers to detect patterns, groupings, and correlation. Each dimension is assigned to a facial characteristic, for example eyebrow slant, eye spacing, head eccentricity, pupil size, et cetera. Inside the data set each dimension represents a feature which can be classified. If we say for example that one feature of our face displays the rate of unemployment (rate) we could classify that rate into three classes e.g. rate < 3%, 3% < rate < 6% or rate > 6%. So we have three classes for the feature rate of unemployment. As each feature describes a characteristic of a face we could say that the shape of the mouth could stand for the rate of unemployment as Figure 2 demonstrates.

Fig. 2: Six facial variations
[Spinelli and Zhou, 2004]

Hence, every face unambiguously describes one feature vector, which in turn combines several features to describe one condition, like the quality of life as in [Spinelli and Zhou, 2004].

Critics[edit]

Chernoff faces are not always the best solution for visualizing of multidimensional information. Certain features like the perception of eye size, eyebrow slant and the combination of those both are more influencing for longer viewing times than others. Therefore [Morris et. al, 2000] came to the conclusion that the use of Chernoff faces "may not have a significant advantage over other iconic visualization techniques for multidimensional information visualization.”


References[edit]