Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2007/08 - Gruppe 09 - Aufgabe 1 - Graphical Integrity: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Definition|'''Graphical Integrity''' means that a graph is telling the truth about its underlying data.}}
{{Definition|'''Graphical Integrity''' means that a graph is telling the truth about its underlying data.}}


Therefore it has to be ensured that the visual representation of the data is consistent with the numerical representation. This can be done by avoiding visual distortion. Sometimes graphs are used to confuse or mislead the naive viewer but that is not a very honorable goal. Graphs that have Graphical Integrity are tools for exploring complicated data, and gaining new insight into quantitive information.
Therefore it has to be ensured that the visual representation of the data is consistent with its numerical representation. This can be done by avoiding visual distortion. Sometimes graphs  


== Principles to ensure Graphical Integrity [Tufte, 2001] ==
are used to confuse or mislead the naive viewer but that is not a very honorable goal. Graphs that have Graphical Integrity are tools for exploring complicated data, and gaining new


insight into quantitive information.
In order to create a good graph the human perception hast to be taken into acount. Different people have different perceptions which also change with experience.




# The representation of numbers, as physically measured on the surface of the graphics itself, should be directly proportional to the numerical quantities represented.
== Principles to ensure Graphical Integrity  ==
# Clear, detailed, and thorough labeling should be used to defeat graphics distortion and ambiguity.
# Show data variation, not design variation.
# In time-series displays of money, deflated and standardized units of monetary measurement are nearly always better than nominal units.
# The number of information-carrying dimensions depicted should not exceed the number of dimensions in the data.
# Graphics must not quote data out of context.




!!!NICHT FERTIG!!!
 
Tufte stated that
{{Quotation|The representation of numbers, as physically measured on the surface of the graphic itself, should be directly proportional to the quantities represented.|[Tufte, 1991]}}
 
This means that each effect on the data should have an effect of equal size on the graph. This is called the [[Lie Factor]] of the graph. A Lie Factor that differs from 1 indicates
 
distortion in the graph which leads to less Graphical Integrity.
Another principle to ensure Graphical Integrity is to use clear, detailed, and thorough labeling in order to defeat graphics distortion and ambiguity. The data should be explained on the
 
graphic and important data points should be labeled.
 
Tufte also formulated a principle regarding displays of money, he stated that
 
{{Quotation|In time-series displays of money, deflated and standardized units of monetary measurement are nearly always better than nominal units.|[Tufte, 1991]}}
 
The following pictures show graphs of government spending over time. In the first one shows the spending in dollars which are not corrected for inflation. This falesly suggests that the
 
spending has increased over the last years. In reality the value of the dollar has decreased due to inflation. Picture 2 shows the same graph with corrected values.
Furthermore the first graph doesnt take the potential increase in state population into acount which also affects the integrety of the graph. Picture 3 shows the same graph corrected for
 
state population.
 
[[Image:Budget2.jpg]] [[Image:Budget3.jpg]] [[Image:Budget1.jpg]]
 
 
Another important principle stated by Tufte is
 
 
{{Quotation|Graphics must not quote data out of context.|[Tufte, 1991]}}
 
If a graphic shows data out of context the viewer could be mislead because he has no information needed for comparison. A different context can lead to very differing interpretations of
 
the data. The following pictures illustrate the problem.
 
 
[[Image:Context1.jpg]] [[Image:Context2.jpg]] [[Image:Context3.jpg]]
 
 
== References ==
 
[Tufte, 1991] Edward Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Second Edition, Graphics Press, USA, 1991.
 
[Childs, 2007] Christopher Childs, Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, The SDSU Department of Educational Technology, Retrieved at: November 8, 2007.
 
http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/graphicinteg/index.htm .

Latest revision as of 15:09, 8 November 2007

Defnition[edit]

Graphical Integrity means that a graph is telling the truth about its underlying data.

Therefore it has to be ensured that the visual representation of the data is consistent with its numerical representation. This can be done by avoiding visual distortion. Sometimes graphs

are used to confuse or mislead the naive viewer but that is not a very honorable goal. Graphs that have Graphical Integrity are tools for exploring complicated data, and gaining new

insight into quantitive information. In order to create a good graph the human perception hast to be taken into acount. Different people have different perceptions which also change with experience.


Principles to ensure Graphical Integrity[edit]

Tufte stated that

The representation of numbers, as physically measured on the surface of the graphic itself, should be directly proportional to the quantities represented.
[Tufte, 1991]


This means that each effect on the data should have an effect of equal size on the graph. This is called the Lie Factor of the graph. A Lie Factor that differs from 1 indicates

distortion in the graph which leads to less Graphical Integrity.

Another principle to ensure Graphical Integrity is to use clear, detailed, and thorough labeling in order to defeat graphics distortion and ambiguity. The data should be explained on the

graphic and important data points should be labeled.

Tufte also formulated a principle regarding displays of money, he stated that

In time-series displays of money, deflated and standardized units of monetary measurement are nearly always better than nominal units.
[Tufte, 1991]


The following pictures show graphs of government spending over time. In the first one shows the spending in dollars which are not corrected for inflation. This falesly suggests that the

spending has increased over the last years. In reality the value of the dollar has decreased due to inflation. Picture 2 shows the same graph with corrected values. Furthermore the first graph doesnt take the potential increase in state population into acount which also affects the integrety of the graph. Picture 3 shows the same graph corrected for

state population.


Another important principle stated by Tufte is


Graphics must not quote data out of context.
[Tufte, 1991]


If a graphic shows data out of context the viewer could be mislead because he has no information needed for comparison. A different context can lead to very differing interpretations of

the data. The following pictures illustrate the problem.



References[edit]

[Tufte, 1991] Edward Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Second Edition, Graphics Press, USA, 1991.

[Childs, 2007] Christopher Childs, Encyclopedia of Educational Technology, The SDSU Department of Educational Technology, Retrieved at: November 8, 2007.

http://coe.sdsu.edu/eet/articles/graphicinteg/index.htm .