Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2007/08 - Gruppe 02 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
[[Image:few_expenses.png]]
[[Image:few_expenses.png]]
== Critique ==
== Critique ==
 
*'''Formatting of table'''
:Description of the time period ( Qtr4 ) better be placed in Heading.
:Description of the time period ( Qtr4 ) better not be abbreviated.
*'''Fonts'''
*'''Fonts'''


Line 12: Line 14:
:Some of the Fonts used are of the 'fancy type' and thus poorly readable.
:Some of the Fonts used are of the 'fancy type' and thus poorly readable.


*'''Grouping of columns'''
*'''Formatting of values'''
 
*'''Formats of values'''


:Date Format not consistent in length. Better use two-digit day and month.
:Date Format not consistent in length. Better use two-digit day and month.
:Date separation: Better use dash '''-''' than slash '''/'''
:Date separation: Better use dash '''-''' than slash '''/'''
:Transaction date is right-aligned, therefore too close to description of Expense-Type.
:Transaction date is right-aligned, therefore too close to description of Expense-Type.
== Links ==
== Links ==



Revision as of 22:50, 16 November 2007

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 2

Zu beurteilende Tabelle

Critique

  • Formatting of table
Description of the time period ( Qtr4 ) better be placed in Heading.
Description of the time period ( Qtr4 ) better not be abbreviated.
  • Fonts
More than one font used
Some of the Fonts used are of the 'fancy type' and thus poorly readable.
  • Formatting of values
Date Format not consistent in length. Better use two-digit day and month.
Date separation: Better use dash - than slash /
Transaction date is right-aligned, therefore too close to description of Expense-Type.

Links