Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2006/07 - Gruppe 08 - Aufgabe 2: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


=== Criticism ===
=== Criticism ===
* gradient-fill of the year-columns - unnecessary ''Chartjunk''
* Gradient-fill of the year-columns - unnecessary ''Chartjunk''.
* six cakes for one data-row - very low ''Data Density''
* Six cakes for one data-row - very low ''Data Density''.
* The individual pie charts are virtually indistinguishable, making pie charts a rather poor choice in this context.
* The individual pie charts are virtually indistinguishable, making pie charts a rather poor choice in this context.
* cakes are arranged diagonally without any meaning (except for the growing years)
* The pie charts are arranged diagonally without any meaning (except for the growing years).
* The position of the pie charts suggests an increase on the y-axis which doesn't have any function or labels.
* The position of the pie charts suggests an increase on the y-axis which doesn't have any function or labels.
* 4 graph-labels in different font with redundant information
* Four graph-labels in different font with redundant information.
* The labels are not anywhere near the pie charts and have to be found to derive any meaning from the charts.
* The labels are not anywhere near the pie charts and have to be found to derive any meaning from the charts.


Line 15: Line 15:


=== Improvements ===
=== Improvements ===
* Market share changes visible over the years.
* Market share changes are visible over the years.
* Removed confusing and unnecessary backgrounds.
* Removed confusing and unnecessary backgrounds.
* Increased data-ink ratio.
* Increased data-ink ratio.
* Labels are clearly visible next to the lines.
* Labels are clearly visible next to the lines.
* Difference between market shares easy to determine.
* Difference between market shares easy to determine.

Revision as of 16:55, 13 November 2006

Poor Graphic

Sotheby's / Christie's Worldwide Sales Market Share Analysis

Criticism

  • Gradient-fill of the year-columns - unnecessary Chartjunk.
  • Six cakes for one data-row - very low Data Density.
  • The individual pie charts are virtually indistinguishable, making pie charts a rather poor choice in this context.
  • The pie charts are arranged diagonally without any meaning (except for the growing years).
  • The position of the pie charts suggests an increase on the y-axis which doesn't have any function or labels.
  • Four graph-labels in different font with redundant information.
  • The labels are not anywhere near the pie charts and have to be found to derive any meaning from the charts.

Improved Graphic

Improvements

  • Market share changes are visible over the years.
  • Removed confusing and unnecessary backgrounds.
  • Increased data-ink ratio.
  • Labels are clearly visible next to the lines.
  • Difference between market shares easy to determine.