Explode to Explain: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[Image:Explode3.jpg]] <br/> | [[Image:Explode3.jpg]] <br/> | ||
Figure 2. Exploded explanation of a treemap <br/> | Figure 2. Exploded explanation of a [[Treemap|treemap]] <br/> | ||
[[Treemap|Treemap]] is exploded to a serie of pictures. It shows the view-dependent explosion intodepth and the superimposing of underlying hierarchy. This kind of ilustration is applicable to most implicit 2D-techniques. | [[Treemap|Treemap]] is exploded to a serie of pictures. It shows the view-dependent explosion intodepth and the superimposing of underlying hierarchy. This kind of ilustration is applicable to most implicit 2D-techniques. | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Figure 3. Highlighting the important data items by adding exploded view to a) recursive pattern technique, b) treemap<br/> | Figure 3. Highlighting the important data items by adding exploded view to a) recursive pattern technique, b) treemap<br/> | ||
In recursive pattern the five highest values are pointed by arrows (left) and the data of those points is shown in right (Figure 3. (a)). In [[Treemap|treemap]] | In recursive pattern the five highest values are pointed by arrows (left) and the data of those points is shown in right (Figure 3. (a)). In [[Treemap|treemap]] the three most complex biological orders within the phylum of vertebrates are accentuated and labeled with their Latin name and their complexity value (Horton-Strahler number) (Figure 3. (b)). | ||
Revision as of 17:14, 7 May 2008
Authors
Short description
The basic problem behind this technique is, the complexity and sophistication of visualization techniques used to visualize constantly growing large data volumes and complex interrelationships. Traditional and easily self-explanatory techniques are not appropriate to visualize more complex interrelationships. On the other hand more complex visualization techniques are often very hard to understand for non expert people.
Exploded views are used widely in for example technical drawings. The idea is to show all details of a complicated construction by exploding the components and then showing the relationships of the components. Luboschik and Schumann (2007) propose the use of explosion for explaining the more complex information visualization technologies.
The explosition of basic visualization can be summarized in four steps.
1. Select a region of interest in the visual representation that will be used as akey element to explain the technique.
2. Generate an appropiate explosion scheme based on the underlying techniques.
3. Explode in comprehensive way.
4. Superimpose explanatory elements.
Figures
Figure 1. Exploded view of stepwise separation of recursion pattern.
In Figure 1. is explained the recursive pattern technique by using the explosion. All the steps of separation are shown from left to right and additional annotations are added to explain the semantic of recursion. One recursive pattern represents the data of one year, that is separated into its quarters, months and so on.
Figure 2. Exploded explanation of a treemap
Treemap is exploded to a serie of pictures. It shows the view-dependent explosion intodepth and the superimposing of underlying hierarchy. This kind of ilustration is applicable to most implicit 2D-techniques.
Figure 3. Highlighting the important data items by adding exploded view to a) recursive pattern technique, b) treemap
In recursive pattern the five highest values are pointed by arrows (left) and the data of those points is shown in right (Figure 3. (a)). In treemap the three most complex biological orders within the phylum of vertebrates are accentuated and labeled with their Latin name and their complexity value (Horton-Strahler number) (Figure 3. (b)).
Suitable Datatypes
Basically all kind of data presented in 2D- form can be illustrated.