Talk:Draft taxonomy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
added some issues for discussion |
Interaction - where to put it? |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== what requires work? == | == what requires work? == | ||
??? | |||
== added [[Sonification]] == | |||
A related field or subfield? | |||
Either way [[Sonification]] seems to share many of the same concerns, and would seem to be complementary at the very least. | |||
Comments? | |||
== Interaction - where to put it? == | |||
"Interaction techniques" is both, a high level element in the taxonomy and also a part of "Visualization Design Patterns" / "Interaction Patterns". It is hard for me to discern the difference? In order to reflect the importance of interaction, I would rather vote for making it a top level entry and moving down the interaction patterns entries... | |||
-- [[User:Iwolf|Wolfgang Aigner]] 10:19, 8 April 2008 (CEST) | |||
[[ | |||
Latest revision as of 09:19, 8 April 2008
what requires work?
???
added Sonification
A related field or subfield?
Either way Sonification seems to share many of the same concerns, and would seem to be complementary at the very least.
Comments?
Interaction - where to put it?
"Interaction techniques" is both, a high level element in the taxonomy and also a part of "Visualization Design Patterns" / "Interaction Patterns". It is hard for me to discern the difference? In order to reflect the importance of interaction, I would rather vote for making it a top level entry and moving down the interaction patterns entries...
-- Wolfgang Aigner 10:19, 8 April 2008 (CEST)