Talk:Draft taxonomy: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
started discussion
 
Interaction - where to put it?
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
How about
== what requires work? ==


* Techniques
* Usability
* Applications
* Collaborative Visualisation
* Web Visualisation
* Large Scale Visualisation
* Visual Analytics
* Knowledge Visualisation
** Knowledge Visualisation - New Classifications
** Knowledge Visualisation - Theory
** Knowledge Visualisation - Application
** Knowledge Visualisation - Indigenous Knowledge Visualisation
* Knowledge Domain Visualisation
* in Biomedical Informatics-IVBi
* in Built and Rural Environments
* Design Visualisation
* Visual Data Mining
* Interaction
** [[Dynamic queries]]
** [[Direct manipulation]]
** Zooming interface
** [[Details on demand]]
* Applications of Graph Theory
* Applications of Information Extraction
* Applications of Data Mining
* Augmented, Mixed and Virtual Reality
* Multimedia and E-Learning
* Digital Art
* Animation, Computer Games and their Applications
* Education


???


[[Category:Coffee Room]]
 
== added [[Sonification]]  ==
 
A related field or subfield?
 
Either way  [[Sonification]]  seems to share many of the same concerns, and would seem to be complementary at the very least.
 
Comments?
 
== Interaction - where to put it? ==
 
"Interaction techniques" is both, a high level element in the taxonomy and also a part of "Visualization Design Patterns" / "Interaction Patterns". It is hard for me to discern the difference? In order to reflect the importance of interaction, I would rather vote for making it a top level entry and moving down the interaction patterns entries...
 
-- [[User:Iwolf|Wolfgang Aigner]] 10:19, 8 April 2008 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 09:19, 8 April 2008

what requires work?

???


added Sonification

A related field or subfield?

Either way Sonification seems to share many of the same concerns, and would seem to be complementary at the very least.

Comments?

Interaction - where to put it?

"Interaction techniques" is both, a high level element in the taxonomy and also a part of "Visualization Design Patterns" / "Interaction Patterns". It is hard for me to discern the difference? In order to reflect the importance of interaction, I would rather vote for making it a top level entry and moving down the interaction patterns entries...

-- Wolfgang Aigner 10:19, 8 April 2008 (CEST)