Visualization-specific Guidelines (Tory and Möller, 2004): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:#be '''domain and task specific''' or | :#be '''domain and task specific''' or | ||
:#look at '''domain-independent subtasks''' such as those defined by Shneiderman [Shneiderman, 1997]: overview, zoom, filter, details-on-demand, relate, history, and extract. | :#look at '''domain-independent subtasks''' such as those defined by Shneiderman [Shneiderman, 1997]: overview, zoom, filter, details-on-demand, relate, history, and extract. | ||
*To support users with different tasks and requirements, '''multiple visual representations of the data should be available'''. Several representations may be visible at once using multiple view windows. If it is not possible to render a global view of the data set in which every element is precisely represented, it is possible to combine detailed, partial representation(s) with vague, global representation(s). For example, in a medical imaging data set, slices and subvolumes of specific areas could be combined with a volume rendered overview of the entire volume. | |||
**Changing between representations and views should be easy. | |||
**Using multiple views is not always appropriate. Baldonado et al. describe a set of guidelines for when and how to utilize multiple views for visualization tasks [Baldonado et al., 2000]. | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
* [Baldonado et al., 2000] M.Q.W. Baldonado, A. Woodruff, and A. Kuchinsky, Guidelines for Using Multiple Views in Information Visualization, Proc. Working Conf. Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 110-119, 2000. | |||
* [Shneiderman, 1997] B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface, third ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1997. | * [Shneiderman, 1997] B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface, third ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1997. | ||
* [Tory and Möller, 2004] Melanie Tory and Torsten Möller, Human Factors in Visualization Research, ''IEEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics'', 10(1):72-84, January/February 2004. | * [Tory and Möller, 2004] Melanie Tory and Torsten Möller, Human Factors in Visualization Research, ''IEEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics'', 10(1):72-84, January/February 2004. | ||
Revision as of 10:57, 7 June 2006
- Since users’ information needs are domain and task dependent, design must either
- be domain and task specific or
- look at domain-independent subtasks such as those defined by Shneiderman [Shneiderman, 1997]: overview, zoom, filter, details-on-demand, relate, history, and extract.
- To support users with different tasks and requirements, multiple visual representations of the data should be available. Several representations may be visible at once using multiple view windows. If it is not possible to render a global view of the data set in which every element is precisely represented, it is possible to combine detailed, partial representation(s) with vague, global representation(s). For example, in a medical imaging data set, slices and subvolumes of specific areas could be combined with a volume rendered overview of the entire volume.
- Changing between representations and views should be easy.
- Using multiple views is not always appropriate. Baldonado et al. describe a set of guidelines for when and how to utilize multiple views for visualization tasks [Baldonado et al., 2000].
References
- [Baldonado et al., 2000] M.Q.W. Baldonado, A. Woodruff, and A. Kuchinsky, Guidelines for Using Multiple Views in Information Visualization, Proc. Working Conf. Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 110-119, 2000.
- [Shneiderman, 1997] B. Shneiderman, Designing the User Interface, third ed. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1997.
- [Tory and Möller, 2004] Melanie Tory and Torsten Möller, Human Factors in Visualization Research, IEEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 10(1):72-84, January/February 2004.