Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 12 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == Aufgabenstellung == [http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/infovis_ue_aufgabe3.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3] === Zu verbessernde Grafik === -----------------...)
 
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
------------------------------- <br> <br>
------------------------------- <br> <br>
[[Image:nyt2.jpg]]
[[Image:nyt2.jpg]]
------------------------------- <br> <br>
==Critique==
* Disturbing * in titles: write annotation in title
* Arrows for bars unnecessary: they dont offer any additional information
* Descriptions should be horizontal
* days and month of election period of each president is unnecessary information
* formatting of text should be consistent (serifs, Cappital letters in Subtitles, etc)
* bubbles not well chosen: false representation of data because
* diagrams could be combined for easier comparison and sortet by election periods of the presidents for an additional quality of information
* vertical scale is not identical on both diagrams (false representation of bars | not compareable) -> political issue?
* Data int ration too low: because of additional gradients, lines and stuff

Revision as of 19:20, 30 November 2009

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3

Zu verbessernde Grafik








Critique

  • Disturbing * in titles: write annotation in title
  • Arrows for bars unnecessary: they dont offer any additional information
  • Descriptions should be horizontal
  • days and month of election period of each president is unnecessary information
  • formatting of text should be consistent (serifs, Cappital letters in Subtitles, etc)
  • bubbles not well chosen: false representation of data because
  • diagrams could be combined for easier comparison and sortet by election periods of the presidents for an additional quality of information
  • vertical scale is not identical on both diagrams (false representation of bars | not compareable) -> political issue?
  • Data int ration too low: because of additional gradients, lines and stuff