Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 02 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==== Residential Mortgages ==== | ==== Residential Mortgages ==== | ||
* Reading this graphic is very difficult | * Reading this graphic is very difficult | ||
* Layering of the circles is confusing - banks are not related just because they have about the same percentage -> use bar charts instead | * Layering of the circles is confusing - banks are not related just because they have about the same percentage -> use bar/line charts instead | ||
* Comments are confusing and need too much space | * Comments are confusing and need too much space | ||
* Use colors which banks have been merged, same colors like in the "percentage growth" creates the linking effect | * Use colors which banks have been merged, same colors like in the "percentage growth" creates the linking effect | ||
* The x-axes is too low-detailed -> use more details: 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% | * The x-axes is too low-detailed -> use more details: 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% | ||
* 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation | |||
==== Bank Deposits ==== | ==== Bank Deposits ==== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
* Circles on the right side don't have any relation to the rest of the graphic | * Circles on the right side don't have any relation to the rest of the graphic | ||
* The use of a bar or pie chart for the amount of money that is partitioned over the 3 banks would help understanding the graphic | * The use of a bar or pie chart for the amount of money that is partitioned over the 3 banks would help understanding the graphic | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 30 November 2009
Aufgabenstellung
Zu verbessernde Grafik
Critics & Good Points
General
- Good use of low-saturated colors
- Information is presented in a nice-to-look-at way
- Wrong visualisation type -> you can't extract the actual information out of this pictures
Percentage Growth
- Gives a good overview
- Topic should be presented larger and stronger
- The use of different colors for the individual banks could achieve linking with the other graphics
Residential Mortgages
- Reading this graphic is very difficult
- Layering of the circles is confusing - banks are not related just because they have about the same percentage -> use bar/line charts instead
- Comments are confusing and need too much space
- Use colors which banks have been merged, same colors like in the "percentage growth" creates the linking effect
- The x-axes is too low-detailed -> use more details: 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%
- 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation
Bank Deposits
- Sense of the graphic is hard to get
- Circles on the right side don't have any relation to the rest of the graphic
- The use of a bar or pie chart for the amount of money that is partitioned over the 3 banks would help understanding the graphic