Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 02 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
amount of ink in the table or graph (i.e., the closer its value is to one), the better | amount of ink in the table or graph (i.e., the closer its value is to one), the better | ||
you’ve highlighted the data [Few 2004b]. | you’ve highlighted the data [Few 2004b]. | ||
*visual clutter | |||
The misalignment of the spending graphic makes the scanning down and across difficult, because we are more sensitve to the vertical and horizontal alignment than we might imagine [Few, 2004a]. | |||
===Correction of the table === | ===Correction of the table === |
Revision as of 12:39, 4 December 2008
Aufgabenstellung
Zu beurteilende Grafik
Beitrag der Steuerpflichtigen zum Einkommensteueraufkommen
Critics on the table
- little data-ink ratio
There is too many unnecessary ink used for the graphic, because the important text and values need less place against the borders around them, but not enough to stand out clearly. The greater the ratio of the ink that you use to communicate the data to the total amount of ink in the table or graph (i.e., the closer its value is to one), the better you’ve highlighted the data [Few 2004b].
- visual clutter
The misalignment of the spending graphic makes the scanning down and across difficult, because we are more sensitve to the vertical and horizontal alignment than we might imagine [Few, 2004a].
Correction of the table
Which changes have been made and why is the changed one better than the original table?
References
- [Few, 2004a]:Stephen Few, Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten, Analytics Press, 2004, Chapter 7 - General Design for Communication.
- [Few, 2004b]: Stephen Few, Elegance Through Simplicity, intelligent enterprise, Oct 16, 2004.