Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 01 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(some more critics added.)
mNo edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
** The CO2 Emissions scale on the left side of the graph can't be taken as a reference, cause it is far away from the CO2 emission bars.
** The CO2 Emissions scale on the left side of the graph can't be taken as a reference, cause it is far away from the CO2 emission bars.
** The negative axis of CO2 Emissions scale refers to nothing, since CO2 emissions can't have a negative value.
** The negative axis of CO2 Emissions scale refers to nothing, since CO2 emissions can't have a negative value.
** The 3-D Scatter plot which aims plotting the relationship between time and rising tides has an unclarity. It is not written on the axes what they refer to. Does the x-axis represent rising tides in centimeters ? or Does the y-axis refer to time in years ?
** The 3-D Scatter plot which aims plotting the relationship between time and rising tides has an unclarity. It is not written on the axes what they refer to. Does the x-axis represent rising sea levels in centimeters ? and Does the y-axis refer to time in years ?.


===Corrections on the table ===
===Corrections on the table ===

Revision as of 16:49, 9 December 2008

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3

Zu beurteilende Grafik


CO2 Emissions

Critics on the table

  • Non-data ink is high :
    • Shadowing and the 3-D visualization of the World Map, 3d visualization of the CO2 emissions and rising tides, these objects increase the non-data ink, thus decreasing the data-ink ratio.
    • 3-D CO2 Emission Bars block some the regions which is supposed to convey important information. (Especially the regions in black)
    • The icon, which aims to emphasize regions of poverty, blocks important information and de-emphasizes the data-ink, although this icon doesn't convey a precise information.
    • Consequently the real message or data is not supported in the Graph, which is against the task of visualizing quantitive information.
  • The data is unorganized :
    • The essential message of the graph is not clear, CO2 emissions of Regions ? Heat the Poor ? or the rising tides ?
    • It is not clear which data has more priority.
    • The data is not sequenced, thus confusing the readers. In other words there is no direction for order in which data should be read.
  • Scales and Plots :
    • The CO2 Emissions scale on the left side of the graph can't be taken as a reference, cause it is far away from the CO2 emission bars.
    • The negative axis of CO2 Emissions scale refers to nothing, since CO2 emissions can't have a negative value.
    • The 3-D Scatter plot which aims plotting the relationship between time and rising tides has an unclarity. It is not written on the axes what they refer to. Does the x-axis represent rising sea levels in centimeters ? and Does the y-axis refer to time in years ?.

Corrections on the table

Links