Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2008/09 - Gruppe 01 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(some critics are added..) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
CO2 Emissions | CO2 Emissions | ||
===Critics on the table=== | |||
* Non-data ink is high : | |||
** Shadowing and the 3-D visualization of the World Map, 3d visualization of the CO2 emissions and rising tides, these objects increase the non-data ink, thus decreasing the data-ink ratio. | |||
** 3-D CO2 Emission Bars block some the regions which is supposed to convey important information. (Especially the regions in black) | |||
** The icon, which aims to emphasize regions of poverty, blocks important information and de-emphasizes the data-ink, although this icon doesn't convey a precise information. | |||
** The real message or data is not supported in the Graph, and this is against the task of visualizing quantitive information. | |||
===Corrections on the table === | |||
Revision as of 15:48, 9 December 2008
Aufgabenstellung
Zu beurteilende Grafik
CO2 Emissions
Critics on the table
- Non-data ink is high :
- Shadowing and the 3-D visualization of the World Map, 3d visualization of the CO2 emissions and rising tides, these objects increase the non-data ink, thus decreasing the data-ink ratio.
- 3-D CO2 Emission Bars block some the regions which is supposed to convey important information. (Especially the regions in black)
- The icon, which aims to emphasize regions of poverty, blocks important information and de-emphasizes the data-ink, although this icon doesn't convey a precise information.
- The real message or data is not supported in the Graph, and this is against the task of visualizing quantitive information.