Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
(It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t)
Line 1: Line 1:
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts., http://www.flickr.com/people/83641406@N05/ SANDRA BULLOCK NUDE,  231, http://www.flickr.com/people/83671127@N08/ MILA KUNIS NUDE,  gpf, http://www.flickr.com/people/83645038@N06/ SOPHIA BUSH NUDEiqdycm, http://www.flickr.com/people/83602968@N03/ ZOOEY DESCHANEL NUDE,  8-P, http://www.flickr.com/people/83652707@N04/ SARAH ROEMER NUDE,  65395, http://www.flickr.com/people/83586110@N05/ VICTORIA JUSTICE NUDE,  kge, http://www.flickr.com/people/83627478@N05/ JENNETTE MCCURDY NAKED,  efvljd, http://www.flickr.com/people/83644908@N02/ LYNDSY FONSECA NAKED,  =-P, http://www.flickr.com/people/83668067@N04/ EVA LONGORIA NAKED,  2940, http://www.flickr.com/people/83656442@N03/ LINDA KOZLOWSKI NUDE,  hmxuoj, http://www.flickr.com/people/83641484@N07/ EVA LONGORIA NUDE,  %],
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index., http://www.flickr.com/people/83626818@N06/ FAIRUZA BALK NUDE,  lczhzh, http://www.flickr.com/people/83690596@N06/ TARA REID NUDE,  htjyg, http://www.flickr.com/people/83595648@N05/ SHAKIRA SEX TAPEhts, http://www.flickr.com/people/83618938@N06/ KALEY CUOCO NUDE,  8DD, http://www.flickr.com/people/83641808@N03/ KATE BOSWORTH NUDE,  uwiscz, http://www.flickr.com/people/83720311@N08/ GEMMA ARTERTON NUDE,  hvvcg, http://www.flickr.com/people/83661006@N07/ JENNA FISCHER NAKED,  8-OOO, http://www.flickr.com/people/83619581@N04/ EVA MENDES NAKED,  skubf, http://www.flickr.com/people/83640740@N02/ MICHELLE WILLIAMS NUDE,  :], http://www.flickr.com/people/83650000@N06/ RACHEL NICHOLS NUDE,  485,

Revision as of 13:01, 9 August 2012

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index., http://www.flickr.com/people/83626818@N06/ FAIRUZA BALK NUDE, lczhzh, http://www.flickr.com/people/83690596@N06/ TARA REID NUDE, htjyg, http://www.flickr.com/people/83595648@N05/ SHAKIRA SEX TAPE, hts, http://www.flickr.com/people/83618938@N06/ KALEY CUOCO NUDE, 8DD, http://www.flickr.com/people/83641808@N03/ KATE BOSWORTH NUDE, uwiscz, http://www.flickr.com/people/83720311@N08/ GEMMA ARTERTON NUDE, hvvcg, http://www.flickr.com/people/83661006@N07/ JENNA FISCHER NAKED, 8-OOO, http://www.flickr.com/people/83619581@N04/ EVA MENDES NAKED, skubf, http://www.flickr.com/people/83640740@N02/ MICHELLE WILLIAMS NUDE,  :], http://www.flickr.com/people/83650000@N06/ RACHEL NICHOLS NUDE, 485,