User contributions for 46.21.144.51
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
4 August 2012
- 14:4814:48, 4 August 2012 diff hist +33 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 12:4312:43, 4 August 2012 diff hist +218 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://www.flickr.com/people/83650000@N06/ RACHE
- 10:4010:40, 4 August 2012 diff hist −100 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://w
- 08:4208:42, 4 August 2012 diff hist +375 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 06:3706:37, 4 August 2012 diff hist −376 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 04:3304:33, 4 August 2012 diff hist +206 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
- 02:3002:30, 4 August 2012 diff hist −50 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 00:3800:38, 4 August 2012 diff hist +336 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
3 August 2012
- 20:2620:26, 3 August 2012 diff hist +31 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
- 18:0718:07, 3 August 2012 diff hist −143 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 16:0516:05, 3 August 2012 diff hist +17 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://www.flickr.com/people/83606212@N05/ LEIGHTON MEES
- 14:0014:00, 3 August 2012 diff hist −50 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://www.flickr.com/people/83690815@N08/ VICTO
- 11:5811:58, 3 August 2012 diff hist +534 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 09:5409:54, 3 August 2012 diff hist −151 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 07:5107:51, 3 August 2012 diff hist −151 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 05:4605:46, 3 August 2012 diff hist +52 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 03:4103:41, 3 August 2012 diff hist −218 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 01:3801:38, 3 August 2012 diff hist +365 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
2 August 2012
- 23:3523:35, 2 August 2012 diff hist −185 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://w
- 21:4621:46, 2 August 2012 diff hist −393 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
- 19:3619:36, 2 August 2012 diff hist −252 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
- 17:2717:27, 2 August 2012 diff hist +13 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 15:1815:18, 2 August 2012 diff hist −49 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 13:1013:10, 2 August 2012 diff hist −15 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://www.flickr.com/people/83616304@N05/ KELLY STABLES NUDE, >
- 11:0411:04, 2 August 2012 diff hist +366 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
- 09:1509:15, 2 August 2012 diff hist +77 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 07:0707:07, 2 August 2012 diff hist +103 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 05:0105:01, 2 August 2012 diff hist +62 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 02:5802:58, 2 August 2012 diff hist +248 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 01:0601:06, 2 August 2012 diff hist +9 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://www.flickr.com/people
1 August 2012
- 22:5922:59, 1 August 2012 diff hist +151 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 20:5320:53, 1 August 2012 diff hist +276 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 19:0519:05, 1 August 2012 diff hist +320 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 16:5816:58, 1 August 2012 diff hist +145 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 15:0715:07, 1 August 2012 diff hist −210 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
- 13:0013:00, 1 August 2012 diff hist +251 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 11:0011:00, 1 August 2012 diff hist +257 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
31 July 2012
- 07:1807:18, 31 July 2012 diff hist +396 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 05:0805:08, 31 July 2012 diff hist −197 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 03:1603:16, 31 July 2012 diff hist +25 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
- 01:1101:11, 31 July 2012 diff hist +254 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
30 July 2012
- 23:2423:24, 30 July 2012 diff hist −157 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 21:1921:19, 30 July 2012 diff hist −245 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 19:1419:14, 30 July 2012 diff hist +35 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 17:0717:07, 30 July 2012 diff hist −188 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
- 15:1915:19, 30 July 2012 diff hist +318 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 13:1513:15, 30 July 2012 diff hist +174 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 11:0911:09, 30 July 2012 diff hist −228 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://www.flickr.com/people/82285630@N02/ LINDS
- 09:0309:03, 30 July 2012 diff hist −140 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 07:0007:00, 30 July 2012 diff hist +134 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i