User contributions for 46.21.144.52

Results for 46.21.144.52 talk block log logs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

12 August 2012

11 August 2012

  • 23:2323:23, 11 August 2012 diff hist +267 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • 21:2221:22, 11 August 2012 diff hist −60 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 19:2319:23, 11 August 2012 diff hist +149 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • 17:2217:22, 11 August 2012 diff hist +146 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • 15:3615:36, 11 August 2012 diff hist −162 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • 13:3113:31, 11 August 2012 diff hist +75 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 11:2611:26, 11 August 2012 diff hist −181 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • 09:2409:24, 11 August 2012 diff hist +193 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • 07:3007:30, 11 August 2012 diff hist +256 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • 05:2305:23, 11 August 2012 diff hist −102 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • 03:3003:30, 11 August 2012 diff hist −442 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://lmsashaalexandernudeb9.tumblr.com SASHA ALEXANDER S
  • 01:2701:27, 11 August 2012 diff hist −53 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread

10 August 2012

9 August 2012

  • 22:3922:39, 9 August 2012 diff hist +266 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 20:3720:37, 9 August 2012 diff hist −382 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://www.flickr.com/people
  • 18:3418:34, 9 August 2012 diff hist −5 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://www.flickr.com/people/83647231@N04/ KAT DENNINGS NU
  • 16:3816:38, 9 August 2012 diff hist −345 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://www.flickr.com/people/83624964@N03/ JENNIFER MORR
  • 14:3414:34, 9 August 2012 diff hist +42 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 12:4512:45, 9 August 2012 diff hist +47 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • 10:4410:44, 9 August 2012 diff hist −86 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • 08:3808:38, 9 August 2012 diff hist +358 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 06:4106:41, 9 August 2012 diff hist +100 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 04:3804:38, 9 August 2012 diff hist +261 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 02:4402:44, 9 August 2012 diff hist +260 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • 00:4100:41, 9 August 2012 diff hist −310 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT

8 August 2012

  • 22:3622:36, 8 August 2012 diff hist +17 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 20:3220:32, 8 August 2012 diff hist +40 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 18:3518:35, 8 August 2012 diff hist −31 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • 16:3216:32, 8 August 2012 diff hist +174 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • 14:4814:48, 8 August 2012 diff hist +126 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)