User contributions for 46.21.144.51

28 June 2012

• 01:0001:00, 28 June 2012 diff hist +230‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is

27 June 2012

• 23:1623:16, 27 June 2012 diff hist +181‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 21:2421:24, 27 June 2012 diff hist +123‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://dailybooth.com/termenmplatloe1979/26301407 CATHER
• 19:3319:33, 27 June 2012 diff hist +29‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 17:4817:48, 27 June 2012 diff hist −95‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
• 15:5015:50, 27 June 2012 diff hist +90‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
• 13:5313:53, 27 June 2012 diff hist +156‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
• 11:5811:58, 27 June 2012 diff hist +128‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
• 10:0810:08, 27 June 2012 diff hist +167‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://dailybooth.com/deopayplicsum1984/26274070
• 08:2708:27, 27 June 2012 diff hist −584‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://dailybooth.com/amintoco1979/26267432 TRISH STRATUS SEX, >
• 07:3307:33, 27 June 2012 diff hist +129‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 06:0806:08, 27 June 2012 diff hist +248‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
• 04:4204:42, 27 June 2012 diff hist −309‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://dailybooth.com/delilema1984/26370019 KATE WINSLET
• 03:2003:20, 27 June 2012 diff hist +254‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://dailybooth.com/dessigatua1985/26224814 GEMMA ATKINSON NAKED
• 01:5801:58, 27 June 2012 diff hist +185‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 00:3900:39, 27 June 2012 diff hist −47‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://dailybooth.com/subgecelis1976/26062819 JENNIFER E

26 June 2012

• 23:1423:14, 26 June 2012 diff hist −98‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://d
• 21:4821:48, 26 June 2012 diff hist −311‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 20:3020:30, 26 June 2012 diff hist +202‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 19:0419:04, 26 June 2012 diff hist +52‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 17:3917:39, 26 June 2012 diff hist +211‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 16:2116:21, 26 June 2012 diff hist −16‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 14:5314:53, 26 June 2012 diff hist +194‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
• 13:2513:25, 26 June 2012 diff hist +155‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 12:0012:00, 26 June 2012 diff hist +219‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 10:4310:43, 26 June 2012 diff hist −126‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://dailybooth.com/monssisucdu1984/26064780 KARINA SMIRNOFF PLA
• 07:4907:49, 26 June 2012 diff hist +392‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
• 06:1906:19, 26 June 2012 diff hist −194‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 04:5604:56, 26 June 2012 diff hist −306‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 03:3403:34, 26 June 2012 diff hist −104‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
• 02:1902:19, 26 June 2012 diff hist −256‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 00:5900:59, 26 June 2012 diff hist +210‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as

25 June 2012

• 23:3123:31, 25 June 2012 diff hist +276‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 20:3520:35, 25 June 2012 diff hist +304‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
• 19:0419:04, 25 June 2012 diff hist +125‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
• 17:3617:36, 25 June 2012 diff hist −259‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 16:0816:08, 25 June 2012 diff hist +49‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
• 14:4414:44, 25 June 2012 diff hist −240‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://dailybooth.com/halutari1971/26221466 LILY COLE PLAYBOY, 8P
• 13:1713:17, 25 June 2012 diff hist +69‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 11:5111:51, 25 June 2012 diff hist +361‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 10:2410:24, 25 June 2012 diff hist +93‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
• 08:5708:57, 25 June 2012 diff hist −250‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://dailybooth.com/draglisucsa1976/26243165 KELLY PREST
• 07:2907:29, 25 June 2012 diff hist −41‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://dailybooth.com/plimmeypravbas1982/2645702
• 06:0106:01, 25 June 2012 diff hist −132‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://d
• 04:3904:39, 25 June 2012 diff hist −214‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i

24 June 2012

• 13:3913:39, 24 June 2012 diff hist −178‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 12:5412:54, 24 June 2012 diff hist −178‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://dailybooth.com/balval
• 11:5911:59, 24 June 2012 diff hist +138‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
• 11:0811:08, 24 June 2012 diff hist −279‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
• 10:1410:14, 24 June 2012 diff hist −22‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT