User contributions for 46.21.144.52
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
8 June 2012
- 12:1012:10, 8 June 2012 diff hist +259 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 11:2711:27, 8 June 2012 diff hist +213 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 10:4510:45, 8 June 2012 diff hist +382 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 10:0210:02, 8 June 2012 diff hist +83 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
- 09:1909:19, 8 June 2012 diff hist −132 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 08:3408:34, 8 June 2012 diff hist +120 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://gnudednakedhsex.insanejournal.com SELENA GOMEZ NU
- 07:5007:50, 8 June 2012 diff hist −96 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://onudelnakedlsex.insan
- 07:0607:06, 8 June 2012 diff hist +160 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 06:2306:23, 8 June 2012 diff hist +323 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 05:4005:40, 8 June 2012 diff hist −32 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
- 04:5404:54, 8 June 2012 diff hist +332 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 04:1104:11, 8 June 2012 diff hist +292 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 03:2603:26, 8 June 2012 diff hist +65 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 02:3802:38, 8 June 2012 diff hist +305 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 01:5101:51, 8 June 2012 diff hist −240 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 01:0701:07, 8 June 2012 diff hist +159 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 00:2400:24, 8 June 2012 diff hist −65 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
7 June 2012
- 23:4023:40, 7 June 2012 diff hist +149 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
- 22:5622:56, 7 June 2012 diff hist +62 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 22:1222:12, 7 June 2012 diff hist +62 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
- 21:2821:28, 7 June 2012 diff hist −371 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://s
- 20:4420:44, 7 June 2012 diff hist +178 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
- 19:5819:58, 7 June 2012 diff hist −303 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 19:1419:14, 7 June 2012 diff hist +299 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 18:3018:30, 7 June 2012 diff hist −218 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://lnudeznakedesex.insanejournal.com JENNIFER TAYLOR
- 17:4517:45, 7 June 2012 diff hist +234 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 17:0117:01, 7 June 2012 diff hist +293 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://knudeenakedlsex.insanejournal.com MARIAH
- 16:1516:15, 7 June 2012 diff hist −34 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 15:2815:28, 7 June 2012 diff hist +210 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 14:4214:42, 7 June 2012 diff hist −317 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 13:5513:55, 7 June 2012 diff hist +11 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
- 13:0913:09, 7 June 2012 diff hist +184 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
- 12:2412:24, 7 June 2012 diff hist −1 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
- 11:3911:39, 7 June 2012 diff hist −11 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://gnudewnaked3sex.insanejournal.com NINA DOBREV SEX VIDEO, 3
- 10:5310:53, 7 June 2012 diff hist +333 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 10:0910:09, 7 June 2012 diff hist +199 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 09:2609:26, 7 June 2012 diff hist +117 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 08:4308:43, 7 June 2012 diff hist +535 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 07:5907:59, 7 June 2012 diff hist +10 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 07:1407:14, 7 June 2012 diff hist −173 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
- 06:2906:29, 7 June 2012 diff hist +124 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 05:4505:45, 7 June 2012 diff hist +30 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 05:0105:01, 7 June 2012 diff hist +381 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 04:1804:18, 7 June 2012 diff hist +142 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
- 03:3603:36, 7 June 2012 diff hist +204 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 02:5202:52, 7 June 2012 diff hist +83 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 02:0902:09, 7 June 2012 diff hist +138 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 01:2501:25, 7 June 2012 diff hist −110 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 00:4100:41, 7 June 2012 diff hist +194 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
6 June 2012
- 23:5523:55, 6 June 2012 diff hist −36 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney