User contributions for 46.21.144.51

For 46.21.144.51 talk block log logs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

4 June 2012

  • 20:2620:26, 4 June 2012 diff hist +288 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailMaybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 19:4219:42, 4 June 2012 diff hist +469 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • 18:5818:58, 4 June 2012 diff hist +318 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • 18:1518:15, 4 June 2012 diff hist −144 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://ynudeqnaked4sex.insanejournal.com SHANNON ELIZABETH
  • 17:3017:30, 4 June 2012 diff hist +338 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailUse your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • 16:4616:46, 4 June 2012 diff hist −177 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://unude1nakedtsex.insanejournal.com CARMEN
  • 16:0216:02, 4 June 2012 diff hist −461 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://cnudewnakedrsex.insanejournal.com JENNETTE MCCURDY HOT, 32
  • 15:1915:19, 4 June 2012 diff hist −207 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • 14:3414:34, 4 June 2012 diff hist −198 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://inudefnakedlsex.insanejournal.com PAULEY PERRETTE NUDE, bh
  • 13:5213:52, 4 June 2012 diff hist +235 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://6nude9nakedrsex.insanejournal.com EMMA WATSON BREAS
  • 13:0813:08, 4 June 2012 diff hist −118 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://unude5nakedzsex.insanejournal.com MILA KUNIS SEX TAPE, 010
  • 12:2312:23, 4 June 2012 diff hist +216 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 11:3911:39, 4 June 2012 diff hist −77 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 10:5710:57, 4 June 2012 diff hist −84 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHonestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • 10:1510:15, 4 June 2012 diff hist −159 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailGood for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • 09:3409:34, 4 June 2012 diff hist +46 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://nnudebnaked1sex.insanejournal.com CHRISTI
  • 08:5308:53, 4 June 2012 diff hist +434 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • 08:0008:00, 4 June 2012 diff hist −56 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://4nudeonakedasex.insanejournal.com KARISSA SHANNON SEX, :-]
  • 07:0107:01, 4 June 2012 diff hist +280 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHaving said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 06:0506:05, 4 June 2012 diff hist +193 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 05:0605:06, 4 June 2012 diff hist −65 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailMaybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 04:0904:09, 4 June 2012 diff hist +175 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 03:1103:11, 4 June 2012 diff hist −320 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • 02:1402:14, 4 June 2012 diff hist −93 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIs there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 01:1801:18, 4 June 2012 diff hist −56 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOne condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • 00:2300:23, 4 June 2012 diff hist +8 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://7nudevnakedasex.insanejournal.com RENEE ZELLWEGER NUDE, b

3 June 2012

  • 23:2623:26, 3 June 2012 diff hist −397 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://bnudeanaked8sex.insanejournal.com AISHWARYA RAI S
  • 22:2822:28, 3 June 2012 diff hist −12 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 21:3021:30, 3 June 2012 diff hist −448 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://onudernakedlsex.insanejournal.com LAURA PREPON NUDE
  • 20:3220:32, 3 June 2012 diff hist +97 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • 19:3019:30, 3 June 2012 diff hist −78 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 18:3118:31, 3 June 2012 diff hist +153 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 17:3217:32, 3 June 2012 diff hist −193 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailJust look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • 16:3016:30, 3 June 2012 diff hist −312 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://lnude9naked7sex.insanejournal.com JULIE BOWEN NUDE,
  • 15:2815:28, 3 June 2012 diff hist −185 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://znudegnakedisex.insanejournal.com MARY ST
  • 14:2814:28, 3 June 2012 diff hist −167 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • 13:2813:28, 3 June 2012 diff hist −298 Talk:Overview-plus-Detailould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • 12:2912:29, 3 June 2012 diff hist +212 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://4nudelnakedesex.insan
  • 11:3111:31, 3 June 2012 diff hist +27 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailMaybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 10:3310:33, 3 June 2012 diff hist −158 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailGood for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • 09:3809:38, 3 June 2012 diff hist −110 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 08:4208:42, 3 June 2012 diff hist +124 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • 07:4407:44, 3 June 2012 diff hist −114 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://6nudejnaked7sex.insanejournal.com PIPER PERABO NUDE
  • 07:0007:00, 3 June 2012 diff hist −123 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailWhat is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 06:1606:16, 3 June 2012 diff hist −67 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • 05:3505:35, 3 June 2012 diff hist +253 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHaving said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 04:4804:48, 3 June 2012 diff hist +222 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 04:0604:06, 3 June 2012 diff hist +67 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIs there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 03:2403:24, 3 June 2012 diff hist +183 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • 02:4302:43, 3 June 2012 diff hist +234 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)