User contributions for 46.21.144.52

For 46.21.144.52 talk block log logs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 April 2012

  • 22:3522:35, 5 April 2012 diff hist +203 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • 22:0522:05, 5 April 2012 diff hist +273 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • 21:3421:34, 5 April 2012 diff hist +114 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • 21:0421:04, 5 April 2012 diff hist −140 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://vtinafeynudeg.tumblr.com tina fey nude, jzqel, h
  • 20:3420:34, 5 April 2012 diff hist +337 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • 20:0420:04, 5 April 2012 diff hist +255 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHaving said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 19:3419:34, 5 April 2012 diff hist −46 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 19:0519:05, 5 April 2012 diff hist −319 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://jnudeunakedxsex.insan
  • 18:3418:34, 5 April 2012 diff hist −265 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://t
  • 18:0318:03, 5 April 2012 diff hist +63 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • 17:3217:32, 5 April 2012 diff hist +97 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • 17:0117:01, 5 April 2012 diff hist +13 Talk:Overview-plus-Detailould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • 16:2916:29, 5 April 2012 diff hist +181 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 15:5815:58, 5 April 2012 diff hist −561 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 15:2615:26, 5 April 2012 diff hist +597 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • 14:5614:56, 5 April 2012 diff hist −12 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailAnd a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • 14:2514:25, 5 April 2012 diff hist −74 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailWhat is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 13:5313:53, 5 April 2012 diff hist −180 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • 13:2213:22, 5 April 2012 diff hist −131 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThe reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • 12:5212:52, 5 April 2012 diff hist +32 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://nnudennakedssex.insanejournal.com vanessa hudgens p
  • 12:2312:23, 5 April 2012 diff hist +478 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHaving said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 11:5311:53, 5 April 2012 diff hist −367 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://inudesnakedesex.insan
  • 11:2311:23, 5 April 2012 diff hist +76 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • 10:5210:52, 5 April 2012 diff hist +131 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • 10:2310:23, 5 April 2012 diff hist +4 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • 09:5209:52, 5 April 2012 diff hist −206 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • 09:2109:21, 5 April 2012 diff hist −18 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHaving said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 08:5108:51, 5 April 2012 diff hist −96 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • 08:2108:21, 5 April 2012 diff hist +159 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 07:4807:48, 5 April 2012 diff hist −48 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailWhat is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 07:1407:14, 5 April 2012 diff hist +53 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 06:3606:36, 5 April 2012 diff hist +227 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIs there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 05:5605:56, 5 April 2012 diff hist +241 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 05:1605:16, 5 April 2012 diff hist −244 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 03:5403:54, 5 April 2012 diff hist +15 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailGood for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • 03:1403:14, 5 April 2012 diff hist +65 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://1megynpricenude5.tumblr.com megyn price nude, tyqm, http:/
  • 02:3402:34, 5 April 2012 diff hist +89 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 01:5301:53, 5 April 2012 diff hist −291 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://9salmahayeknakedp.tumblr.com salma hayek
  • 01:1401:14, 5 April 2012 diff hist −375 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://djenniferanistonnaked
  • 00:3500:35, 5 April 2012 diff hist +19 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailWhat is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT

4 April 2012

  • 23:5523:55, 4 April 2012 diff hist −71 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://jmariaozawasexvideoo.tumblr.com maria oza
  • 23:1623:16, 4 April 2012 diff hist +75 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailWhat is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 22:3622:36, 4 April 2012 diff hist −92 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 21:5421:54, 4 April 2012 diff hist +387 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • 21:1321:13, 4 April 2012 diff hist +259 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailGood for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • 20:3320:33, 4 April 2012 diff hist −348 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33759552 sofia vergara
  • 19:5319:53, 4 April 2012 diff hist −22 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailMaybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 19:1319:13, 4 April 2012 diff hist +7 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailMaybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 18:3418:34, 4 April 2012 diff hist +352 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHaving said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 17:5517:55, 4 April 2012 diff hist −266 Talk:Overview-plus-Detailould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)