User contributions for 46.21.144.51

2 April 2012

• 15:2215:22, 2 April 2012 diff hist −71‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 14:4814:48, 2 April 2012 diff hist +169‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
• 14:1414:14, 2 April 2012 diff hist −5‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 13:4213:42, 2 April 2012 diff hist −299‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://mnudeonakedbsex.insanejournal.com eve torres nude
• 13:0813:08, 2 April 2012 diff hist +394‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 12:3512:35, 2 April 2012 diff hist −219‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
• 12:0212:02, 2 April 2012 diff hist +153‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 11:2911:29, 2 April 2012 diff hist −46‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
• 10:5710:57, 2 April 2012 diff hist −330‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://tnudeinakedfsex.insanejournal.com britney spears sex tape,
• 10:2410:24, 2 April 2012 diff hist +59‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
• 09:5209:52, 2 April 2012 diff hist −370‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 09:2209:22, 2 April 2012 diff hist +272‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
• 08:5108:51, 2 April 2012 diff hist +147‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 08:1508:15, 2 April 2012 diff hist +231‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
• 07:3907:39, 2 April 2012 diff hist +247‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
• 07:0207:02, 2 April 2012 diff hist +206‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
• 06:2606:26, 2 April 2012 diff hist +83‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
• 05:5005:50, 2 April 2012 diff hist +94‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 05:1405:14, 2 April 2012 diff hist +125‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
• 04:3704:37, 2 April 2012 diff hist −380‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 04:0104:01, 2 April 2012 diff hist −167‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
• 02:4802:48, 2 April 2012 diff hist −191‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
• 02:1302:13, 2 April 2012 diff hist −33‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
• 01:3701:37, 2 April 2012 diff hist +197‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 00:2900:29, 2 April 2012 diff hist +384‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie

1 April 2012

• 23:5523:55, 1 April 2012 diff hist +110‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 23:2023:20, 1 April 2012 diff hist +317‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
• 22:4722:47, 1 April 2012 diff hist −473‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
• 22:1422:14, 1 April 2012 diff hist +152‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 21:4121:41, 1 April 2012 diff hist −264‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://pnudeunakedysex.insanejournal.com holly madison nude, :PPP
• 21:0821:08, 1 April 2012 diff hist +385‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 20:3420:34, 1 April 2012 diff hist +164‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
• 20:0120:01, 1 April 2012 diff hist +522‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 19:2719:27, 1 April 2012 diff hist +226‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
• 18:5218:52, 1 April 2012 diff hist −47‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33746902 britne
• 18:1818:18, 1 April 2012 diff hist −161‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
• 17:4317:43, 1 April 2012 diff hist +781‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 17:0917:09, 1 April 2012 diff hist +281‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://l
• 16:3416:34, 1 April 2012 diff hist −103‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33746885 barb
• 16:0016:00, 1 April 2012 diff hist +51‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
• 15:2515:25, 1 April 2012 diff hist +153‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 14:4714:47, 1 April 2012 diff hist −20‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 14:1114:11, 1 April 2012 diff hist +66‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
• 13:3613:36, 1 April 2012 diff hist +92‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 13:0113:01, 1 April 2012 diff hist +18‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
• 12:2512:25, 1 April 2012 diff hist −122‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://ztorriewilsonnakedc.tumblr.com torrie wil
• 11:4911:49, 1 April 2012 diff hist +62‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 11:1711:17, 1 April 2012 diff hist −294‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://dnudewnakedbsex.insanejournal.com hilary swank nude, 8620
• 10:4410:44, 1 April 2012 diff hist +480‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 10:1210:12, 1 April 2012 diff hist +124‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But