User contributions for 46.21.144.52
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
10 February 2012
- 12:2412:24, 10 February 2012 diff hist +42 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 11:5311:53, 10 February 2012 diff hist −106 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 11:2211:22, 10 February 2012 diff hist −61 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
- 10:5110:51, 10 February 2012 diff hist −256 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://j
- 10:2010:20, 10 February 2012 diff hist −83 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://xmirandacosgrovew.freeforums.org miranda
- 09:4909:49, 10 February 2012 diff hist +328 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://eemilybluntv.freeforu
- 09:1909:19, 10 February 2012 diff hist +193 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
- 08:4708:47, 10 February 2012 diff hist −361 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 08:1608:16, 10 February 2012 diff hist +110 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 07:4507:45, 10 February 2012 diff hist −55 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
- 07:1307:13, 10 February 2012 diff hist +156 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
- 06:3706:37, 10 February 2012 diff hist +225 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 06:0706:07, 10 February 2012 diff hist −33 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 05:3605:36, 10 February 2012 diff hist −12 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 05:0605:06, 10 February 2012 diff hist +81 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 04:3504:35, 10 February 2012 diff hist +45 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://jkimkardashianu.freeforums.org kim kardas
- 04:0504:05, 10 February 2012 diff hist −178 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://eevalongorianuden.tumblr.com eva longoria
- 03:3503:35, 10 February 2012 diff hist −340 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 03:0403:04, 10 February 2012 diff hist +94 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
- 02:3302:33, 10 February 2012 diff hist +416 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
- 02:0302:03, 10 February 2012 diff hist −211 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 01:3401:34, 10 February 2012 diff hist +13 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
- 01:0401:04, 10 February 2012 diff hist −51 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 00:3400:34, 10 February 2012 diff hist +114 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 00:0600:06, 10 February 2012 diff hist −255 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
9 February 2012
- 23:3623:36, 9 February 2012 diff hist −260 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 23:0723:07, 9 February 2012 diff hist −67 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://j
- 22:3722:37, 9 February 2012 diff hist −306 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 22:0722:07, 9 February 2012 diff hist +153 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
- 21:3521:35, 9 February 2012 diff hist −179 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://mrachelbilsonnakedr.t
- 21:0621:06, 9 February 2012 diff hist +44 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 20:3420:34, 9 February 2012 diff hist +160 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 20:0420:04, 9 February 2012 diff hist −363 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://femmastonenudew.tumblr.com emma stone nud
- 19:3419:34, 9 February 2012 diff hist −213 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://xselenagomeznudet.tum
- 19:0419:04, 9 February 2012 diff hist +7 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://fkatvondsextapea.tumblr.com kat von d sex tape,
- 18:3518:35, 9 February 2012 diff hist −64 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
- 18:0418:04, 9 February 2012 diff hist −208 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 17:3417:34, 9 February 2012 diff hist +322 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
- 17:0417:04, 9 February 2012 diff hist +28 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
- 16:3516:35, 9 February 2012 diff hist +41 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://zmarysteenburgennudej.tumblr.com mary ste
- 16:0416:04, 9 February 2012 diff hist +61 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
- 15:3315:33, 9 February 2012 diff hist −152 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 15:0315:03, 9 February 2012 diff hist +145 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
- 14:3314:33, 9 February 2012 diff hist −38 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 14:0114:01, 9 February 2012 diff hist −109 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 13:3013:30, 9 February 2012 diff hist +448 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 13:0113:01, 9 February 2012 diff hist −306 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://thaydenpanettierei.freeforums.org hayden panettiere naked,
- 12:3112:31, 9 February 2012 diff hist −63 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 12:0212:02, 9 February 2012 diff hist −47 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 11:3211:32, 9 February 2012 diff hist −390 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is