User contributions for 46.21.144.52

For 46.21.144.52 talk block log logs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 January 2012

13 January 2012

  • 23:4723:47, 13 January 2012 diff hist −718‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • 23:1823:18, 13 January 2012 diff hist −186‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 22:5122:51, 13 January 2012 diff hist −660‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • 22:2222:22, 13 January 2012 diff hist −490‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 21:5421:54, 13 January 2012 diff hist −861‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 21:2421:24, 13 January 2012 diff hist −286‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • 20:5520:55, 13 January 2012 diff hist −445‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • 20:2520:25, 13 January 2012 diff hist −526‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • 19:5719:57, 13 January 2012 diff hist −580‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,
  • 19:2719:27, 13 January 2012 diff hist −365‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 18:5718:57, 13 January 2012 diff hist −669‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating.,
  • 18:2818:28, 13 January 2012 diff hist −450‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 17:5917:59, 13 January 2012 diff hist −704‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 17:2917:29, 13 January 2012 diff hist −463‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 16:5816:58, 13 January 2012 diff hist −937‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 16:2816:28, 13 January 2012 diff hist −721‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,
  • 15:4515:45, 13 January 2012 diff hist −613‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),
  • 14:2214:22, 13 January 2012 diff hist +236‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • 13:5013:50, 13 January 2012 diff hist −76‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://caldeirasyt.livejournal.com DENISE RICHARDS SEX, smgaq, h
  • 13:1913:19, 13 January 2012 diff hist +18‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 12:5012:50, 13 January 2012 diff hist +506‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • 12:1912:19, 13 January 2012 diff hist −207‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 11:4911:49, 13 January 2012 diff hist −291‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • 11:1911:19, 13 January 2012 diff hist +466‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 10:4810:48, 13 January 2012 diff hist −212‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 10:1910:19, 13 January 2012 diff hist −231‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 09:4809:48, 13 January 2012 diff hist −99‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • 09:1709:17, 13 January 2012 diff hist +228‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • 08:4708:47, 13 January 2012 diff hist +110‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 08:1808:18, 13 January 2012 diff hist +198‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • 07:4807:48, 13 January 2012 diff hist −210‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 07:1907:19, 13 January 2012 diff hist +131‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Special:Contributions/46.21.144.52"