User contributions for 46.21.144.51

For 46.21.144.51 talk block log logs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Search for contributionsExpandCollapse
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

7 January 2012

  • 09:5009:50, 7 January 2012 diff hist −161 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThe reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • 09:2309:23, 7 January 2012 diff hist −194 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • 08:5508:55, 7 January 2012 diff hist +219 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIn doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • 08:2808:28, 7 January 2012 diff hist +104 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • 08:0008:00, 7 January 2012 diff hist −233 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://k
  • 07:3307:33, 7 January 2012 diff hist +125 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 07:0607:06, 7 January 2012 diff hist +123 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHonestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • 06:3906:39, 7 January 2012 diff hist +272 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 06:1006:10, 7 January 2012 diff hist +75 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIs there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 05:4205:42, 7 January 2012 diff hist +258 Talk:Overview-plus-Detailould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • 05:1605:16, 7 January 2012 diff hist +100 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHonestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • 04:4704:47, 7 January 2012 diff hist −321 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://rihannanakedpicturespg.freeforums.org rihanna nak
  • 04:1904:19, 7 January 2012 diff hist −95 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOnly reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://sandrabullocksexypb.freeforums.org sandra bullock s
  • 03:5203:52, 7 January 2012 diff hist −13 Talk:Overview-plus-Detailould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • 03:2603:26, 7 January 2012 diff hist +22 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 02:5802:58, 7 January 2012 diff hist +157 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • 02:3002:30, 7 January 2012 diff hist +139 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • 02:0202:02, 7 January 2012 diff hist −107 Talk:Overview-plus-Detailould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • 01:3501:35, 7 January 2012 diff hist +268 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIs there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 01:0801:08, 7 January 2012 diff hist −254 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • 00:4100:41, 7 January 2012 diff hist +444 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • 00:1200:12, 7 January 2012 diff hist −156 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://gwynethpaltrownakedsk.freeforums.org gwyn

6 January 2012

  • 23:4523:45, 6 January 2012 diff hist +148 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailKathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • 23:1523:15, 6 January 2012 diff hist +185 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 22:4822:48, 6 January 2012 diff hist +257 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • 22:2022:20, 6 January 2012 diff hist −25 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://heidiklumhotew.freeforums.org heidi klum hot, xc
  • 21:5221:52, 6 January 2012 diff hist −72 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIs there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • 20:5720:57, 6 January 2012 diff hist −297 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHas he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://jessicaalbapornzw.tumblr.com jessica alba
  • 20:3020:30, 6 January 2012 diff hist −280 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailOodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://h
  • 20:0320:03, 6 January 2012 diff hist −143 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • 19:3419:34, 6 January 2012 diff hist −148 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://sakmarucuko.livejournal.com RACHEL MCADAMS NAKED, 387, htt
  • 19:0619:06, 6 January 2012 diff hist −235 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailO.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://rihannatitsmr.freeforums.org rihanna tits, 0652,
  • 18:3918:39, 6 January 2012 diff hist −220 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailUse your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • 18:1018:10, 6 January 2012 diff hist +145 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • 17:4217:42, 6 January 2012 diff hist −41 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailMaybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • 17:1317:13, 6 January 2012 diff hist +24 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailWhat is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • 16:4516:45, 6 January 2012 diff hist −62 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://taylorlautnernakedkf.
  • 16:1616:16, 6 January 2012 diff hist −124 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 15:4715:47, 6 January 2012 diff hist +16 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailO.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://jamesfranconudeue.tumblr.com james franco nude,
  • 15:1915:19, 6 January 2012 diff hist −200 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • 14:5114:51, 6 January 2012 diff hist −41 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • 14:2414:24, 6 January 2012 diff hist 0 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThe reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • 13:5513:55, 6 January 2012 diff hist +88 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailIt makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • 13:2813:28, 6 January 2012 diff hist +280 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailHonestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • 13:0013:00, 6 January 2012 diff hist +329 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailThat's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • 12:3212:32, 6 January 2012 diff hist +155 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • 12:0512:05, 6 January 2012 diff hist +145 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • 11:3811:38, 6 January 2012 diff hist +212 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailI think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • 11:0911:09, 6 January 2012 diff hist −58 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailTake me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://natalieportmanpornfi.tumblr.com natalie portman porn, >:-]
  • 10:4110:41, 6 January 2012 diff hist +315 Talk:Overview-plus-DetailKathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)