User contributions for 46.21.144.52

6 January 2012

• 16:4816:48, 6 January 2012 diff hist −2‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
• 16:1916:19, 6 January 2012 diff hist −218‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://amberheardsexfn.freef
• 15:5015:50, 6 January 2012 diff hist +513‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
• 15:2115:21, 6 January 2012 diff hist −45‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 14:5214:52, 6 January 2012 diff hist +11‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
• 14:2314:23, 6 January 2012 diff hist −132‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 13:5413:54, 6 January 2012 diff hist −95‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
• 13:2413:24, 6 January 2012 diff hist −187‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 12:5612:56, 6 January 2012 diff hist −256‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://g
• 12:2812:28, 6 January 2012 diff hist −200‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
• 12:0112:01, 6 January 2012 diff hist −56‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 11:3211:32, 6 January 2012 diff hist −33‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://l
• 11:0411:04, 6 January 2012 diff hist −298‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://ashleygreenenudeef.tumblr.com ashley greene nude, 9748, ht
• 10:3410:34, 6 January 2012 diff hist −61‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://naomicampbellhotwx.tumblr.com naomi campbell hot,
• 10:0610:06, 6 January 2012 diff hist +298‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
• 09:3609:36, 6 January 2012 diff hist −262‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://vidaguerraporngh.tumblr.com vida guerra porn, 31584, http:
• 09:0509:05, 6 January 2012 diff hist −19‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
• 08:3608:36, 6 January 2012 diff hist −171‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://crystalharrisnudery.tumblr.com crystal harris nud
• 08:0608:06, 6 January 2012 diff hist −17‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
• 07:3607:36, 6 January 2012 diff hist −37‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://lyssaysim.livejournal.com AVRIL LAVIGNE B
• 07:0607:06, 6 January 2012 diff hist −163‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://sharylnabo.livejourna
• 06:3706:37, 6 January 2012 diff hist +21‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
• 06:0606:06, 6 January 2012 diff hist −149‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
• 05:3505:35, 6 January 2012 diff hist −119‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://richardsud.livejournal.com KATE WINSLET PORN, ke
• 05:0505:05, 6 January 2012 diff hist +118‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
• 04:3504:35, 6 January 2012 diff hist −259‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://mallikasherawatsexhi.tumblr.com mallika sherawat sex, hyh
• 04:0504:05, 6 January 2012 diff hist +38‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 03:3503:35, 6 January 2012 diff hist +194‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 03:0803:08, 6 January 2012 diff hist +168‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://m
• 02:3902:39, 6 January 2012 diff hist +122‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 02:1102:11, 6 January 2012 diff hist +80‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
• 01:4201:42, 6 January 2012 diff hist +289‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 01:1401:14, 6 January 2012 diff hist +225‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
• 00:4600:46, 6 January 2012 diff hist −74‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 00:1800:18, 6 January 2012 diff hist +84‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange

5 January 2012

• 23:5023:50, 5 January 2012 diff hist +230‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 23:2223:22, 5 January 2012 diff hist −397‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 22:5522:55, 5 January 2012 diff hist −373‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
• 22:2722:27, 5 January 2012 diff hist −306‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
• 22:0122:01, 5 January 2012 diff hist +174‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
• 21:3221:32, 5 January 2012 diff hist −197‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 21:0321:03, 5 January 2012 diff hist −185‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://noamiebofe.livejournal.com TILA TEQUILA H
• 20:3420:34, 5 January 2012 diff hist −26‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
• 20:0620:06, 5 January 2012 diff hist +100‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 19:3919:39, 5 January 2012 diff hist +215‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
• 19:0819:08, 5 January 2012 diff hist +11‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
• 18:4118:41, 5 January 2012 diff hist +49‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
• 18:1318:13, 5 January 2012 diff hist +330‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
• 17:4417:44, 5 January 2012 diff hist +511‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 17:1617:16, 5 January 2012 diff hist +33‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in