User contributions for 46.21.144.52

5 January 2012

• 16:4716:47, 5 January 2012 diff hist −171‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
• 16:1716:17, 5 January 2012 diff hist +114‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 15:4815:48, 5 January 2012 diff hist +76‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
• 15:1915:19, 5 January 2012 diff hist −89‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
• 14:4914:49, 5 January 2012 diff hist −83‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 14:2114:21, 5 January 2012 diff hist −29‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://c
• 13:5313:53, 5 January 2012 diff hist −196‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
• 13:2513:25, 5 January 2012 diff hist −186‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://b
• 13:1413:14, 5 January 2012 diff hist +167‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
• 12:4612:46, 5 January 2012 diff hist +145‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
• 12:1712:17, 5 January 2012 diff hist +165‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
• 11:4711:47, 5 January 2012 diff hist −2‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 11:1811:18, 5 January 2012 diff hist −181‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 10:5010:50, 5 January 2012 diff hist +213‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
• 10:2310:23, 5 January 2012 diff hist −70‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://lucypindernudemm.freeforums.org lucy pinder nude,
• 09:5609:56, 5 January 2012 diff hist −94‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
• 09:2809:28, 5 January 2012 diff hist −224‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
• 09:0009:00, 5 January 2012 diff hist +84‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
• 08:3008:30, 5 January 2012 diff hist +190‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
• 08:0208:02, 5 January 2012 diff hist −412‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://drewbarrymorenakedjt.tumblr.com drew barrymore nake
• 07:3307:33, 5 January 2012 diff hist +311‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
• 07:0507:05, 5 January 2012 diff hist +202‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
• 06:3606:36, 5 January 2012 diff hist +136‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
• 06:1006:10, 5 January 2012 diff hist +143‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://rosiehuntingtonwhiteleynudepj.freeforums.org rosie huntingt
• 05:4305:43, 5 January 2012 diff hist −159‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
• 05:1505:15, 5 January 2012 diff hist +11‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://kaleycuocosexymk.freeforums.org kaley cuo
• 04:4804:48, 5 January 2012 diff hist −325‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://adelicerumud.livejournal.com KRISTEN STEWART NUDE,
• 04:2004:20, 5 January 2012 diff hist −66‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
• 03:5303:53, 5 January 2012 diff hist −151‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
• 03:2503:25, 5 January 2012 diff hist −327‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://brendasongbikinivo.freeforums.org brenda
• 02:5802:58, 5 January 2012 diff hist −74‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
• 02:3002:30, 5 January 2012 diff hist −99‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
• 02:0202:02, 5 January 2012 diff hist −303‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://rutheotosi.livejournal.com HILARY DUFF SEXY, 842
• 01:3501:35, 5 January 2012 diff hist +106‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
• 01:0701:07, 5 January 2012 diff hist +379‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
• 00:3900:39, 5 January 2012 diff hist +84‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
• 00:1000:10, 5 January 2012 diff hist −153‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT

4 January 2012

• 23:1223:12, 4 January 2012 diff hist +353‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
• 22:4422:44, 4 January 2012 diff hist −407‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://natalieportmanpornfi.tumblr.com natalie p
• 22:1722:17, 4 January 2012 diff hist −226‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
• 21:4821:48, 4 January 2012 diff hist +370‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
• 21:2021:20, 4 January 2012 diff hist −40‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
• 20:5120:51, 4 January 2012 diff hist +222‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
• 20:2220:22, 4 January 2012 diff hist −37‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
• 19:5419:54, 4 January 2012 diff hist −68‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
• 19:2519:25, 4 January 2012 diff hist −241‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
• 18:5818:58, 4 January 2012 diff hist −192‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://kayeyto.livejournal.com SANDRA BULLOCK ASS, 8-]],
• 18:2818:28, 4 January 2012 diff hist −65‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
• 17:5817:58, 4 January 2012 diff hist +18‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://b
• 17:2917:29, 4 January 2012 diff hist −119‎ Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo