User contributions for 46.21.144.52
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
2 January 2012
- 03:4603:46, 2 January 2012 diff hist −124 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
- 03:1903:19, 2 January 2012 diff hist +95 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 02:5102:51, 2 January 2012 diff hist +238 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 01:5601:56, 2 January 2012 diff hist −294 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 01:2701:27, 2 January 2012 diff hist +193 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://alyssamilanopornay.tumblr.com alyssa milano porn, >:-OOO,
- 01:0001:00, 2 January 2012 diff hist −87 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 00:3300:33, 2 January 2012 diff hist +2 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 00:0500:05, 2 January 2012 diff hist −394 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
1 January 2012
- 23:3623:36, 1 January 2012 diff hist −280 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://channingtatumnakedwq.tumblr.com channing tatum naked, =O,
- 23:0823:08, 1 January 2012 diff hist +288 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 22:4022:40, 1 January 2012 diff hist −10 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 22:1022:10, 1 January 2012 diff hist −268 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://selmablairnudedz.tumblr.com selma blair n
- 21:4121:41, 1 January 2012 diff hist +96 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 21:1421:14, 1 January 2012 diff hist −221 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 20:4620:46, 1 January 2012 diff hist −172 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
- 20:1720:17, 1 January 2012 diff hist −261 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://emmawatsonsexyft.tumb
- 19:4919:49, 1 January 2012 diff hist +393 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 19:2019:20, 1 January 2012 diff hist +83 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
- 18:5218:52, 1 January 2012 diff hist −42 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://catherinezetajonessexwt.tumblr.com catherine zeta
- 18:2318:23, 1 January 2012 diff hist +56 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
- 17:5417:54, 1 January 2012 diff hist +18 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 17:2417:24, 1 January 2012 diff hist +106 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
- 16:5716:57, 1 January 2012 diff hist −170 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
- 16:2816:28, 1 January 2012 diff hist −209 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
- 16:0116:01, 1 January 2012 diff hist −363 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 15:3115:31, 1 January 2012 diff hist −18 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 15:0315:03, 1 January 2012 diff hist −240 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
- 14:3414:34, 1 January 2012 diff hist +113 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
- 14:0614:06, 1 January 2012 diff hist +260 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
- 13:3813:38, 1 January 2012 diff hist +132 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 13:1213:12, 1 January 2012 diff hist +165 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
- 12:4412:44, 1 January 2012 diff hist −56 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://jessicaalbafakesgf.tumblr.com jessica alba fakes, >:PP, ht
- 12:1612:16, 1 January 2012 diff hist +57 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 11:4911:49, 1 January 2012 diff hist −48 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://vidaguerraassdk.tumbl
- 11:2111:21, 1 January 2012 diff hist +10 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 10:5510:55, 1 January 2012 diff hist +391 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 10:2710:27, 1 January 2012 diff hist +186 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 10:0010:00, 1 January 2012 diff hist −125 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
- 09:3109:31, 1 January 2012 diff hist −153 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 09:0209:02, 1 January 2012 diff hist +6 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 08:3408:34, 1 January 2012 diff hist +23 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 08:0608:06, 1 January 2012 diff hist −130 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
- 07:3707:37, 1 January 2012 diff hist +410 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 07:1007:10, 1 January 2012 diff hist −170 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
- 06:4206:42, 1 January 2012 diff hist +38 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 06:1406:14, 1 January 2012 diff hist +316 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 05:4605:46, 1 January 2012 diff hist +353 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 05:1705:17, 1 January 2012 diff hist +156 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
- 04:5004:50, 1 January 2012 diff hist −53 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
- 04:2304:23, 1 January 2012 diff hist +20 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion