User contributions for 46.21.144.52
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
27 November 2011
- 05:2805:28, 27 November 2011 diff hist +321 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 05:0405:04, 27 November 2011 diff hist +133 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
- 04:3804:38, 27 November 2011 diff hist +3 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
- 04:1304:13, 27 November 2011 diff hist +11 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://p
- 03:4903:49, 27 November 2011 diff hist +80 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
- 03:2403:24, 27 November 2011 diff hist −65 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://meganfoxbikiniwm.tumblr.com megan fox bikini, 124723, htt
- 02:5902:59, 27 November 2011 diff hist +168 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 02:3502:35, 27 November 2011 diff hist −246 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://amyadamsnudefd.tumblr.com amy adams nude, 218024, http://a
- 02:1002:10, 27 November 2011 diff hist +273 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 01:4501:45, 27 November 2011 diff hist −160 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://bodereknudehe.tumblr.com bo derek nude, %[, http://denisem
- 01:2001:20, 27 November 2011 diff hist +272 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 00:5700:57, 27 November 2011 diff hist −111 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://keeleyhazellpornif.tumblr.com keeley hazell porn,
- 00:3200:32, 27 November 2011 diff hist −12 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
- 00:0700:07, 27 November 2011 diff hist +81 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
26 November 2011
- 23:4323:43, 26 November 2011 diff hist +174 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 23:1723:17, 26 November 2011 diff hist +62 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
- 22:5322:53, 26 November 2011 diff hist +67 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://kimkardashianpussyzw.tumblr.com kim kardashian pussy, xytm
- 22:2922:29, 26 November 2011 diff hist +178 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 22:0522:05, 26 November 2011 diff hist +352 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 21:4121:41, 26 November 2011 diff hist −161 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://helenmirrenbikinikn.tumblr.com helen mirren bikin
- 21:1721:17, 26 November 2011 diff hist +211 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
- 20:5320:53, 26 November 2011 diff hist +62 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 20:2820:28, 26 November 2011 diff hist +87 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 20:0520:05, 26 November 2011 diff hist −78 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://natalieportmansexsceneik.tumblr.com natalie portm
- 19:3919:39, 26 November 2011 diff hist +113 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
- 19:1419:14, 26 November 2011 diff hist −32 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
- 18:5018:50, 26 November 2011 diff hist +56 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
- 18:2518:25, 26 November 2011 diff hist −218 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://camillabellenudezl.tu
- 18:0118:01, 26 November 2011 diff hist +53 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 17:3617:36, 26 November 2011 diff hist −14 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
- 17:1117:11, 26 November 2011 diff hist +103 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
- 16:4716:47, 26 November 2011 diff hist −201 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
- 16:2216:22, 26 November 2011 diff hist −53 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
- 15:5815:58, 26 November 2011 diff hist +637 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 15:3315:33, 26 November 2011 diff hist +313 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
- 15:0615:06, 26 November 2011 diff hist −98 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://oliviamunnnakedlk.tum
- 14:4114:41, 26 November 2011 diff hist −109 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
- 14:1714:17, 26 November 2011 diff hist +397 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
- 13:5413:54, 26 November 2011 diff hist −121 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
- 13:3113:31, 26 November 2011 diff hist −43 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
- 13:0813:08, 26 November 2011 diff hist −79 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
- 12:4412:44, 26 November 2011 diff hist −52 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 12:2012:20, 26 November 2011 diff hist −75 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://jessicaalbaasshq.tumblr.com jessica alba
- 11:5811:58, 26 November 2011 diff hist +93 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
- 11:3511:35, 26 November 2011 diff hist +388 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
- 11:1111:11, 26 November 2011 diff hist +35 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
- 10:4910:49, 26 November 2011 diff hist −204 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
- 10:2710:27, 26 November 2011 diff hist +269 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
- 10:0310:03, 26 November 2011 diff hist −66 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://selenagomezfakeseu.tumblr.com selena gomez fakes,
- 09:4009:40, 26 November 2011 diff hist +301 Talk:Overview-plus-Detail It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo