Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
Line 1: Line 1:
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*), http://demilovatobikiniys.freeforums.org demi lovato bikini0396, http://rnudebnakedtsex.insanejournal.com adriana lima hotunnw, http://angelinajolietoplessuj.freeforums.org angelina jolie topless>:P, http://androsyheny.livejournal.com KEIRA KNIGHTLEY NUDEalv, http://katewinslethot3.typepad.com kate winslet hotjqibf, http://knudeonakedvsex.insanejournal.com emma watson ass7175, http://rickertyta.livejournal.com MIRANDA KERR HOT7477, http://anudeznakedjsex.insanejournal.com mila kunis toplesskzstk, http://ogdenliv.livejournal.com SOFIA VERGARA SEX>:-PP,
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://onudewnakedfsex.insanejournal.com jenna jameson naked310060, http://britneyspearsnudaql.freeforums.org britney spears nudatdi, http://hilaryduffnaked2.typepad.com hilary duff naked6477, http://keiraknightleynakedxg.tumblr.com keira knightley naked:)), http://paolaepe.livejournal.com STANA KATIC HOT=OO, http://corryemet.livejournal.com CATHERINE BELL NAKED44119, http://jacquelinval.livejournal.com LINDSAY LOHAN NUDE PICSekwpqc, http://ynudeinakedqsex.insanejournal.com monica bellucci porn214, http://bnudexnakedksex.insanejournal.com mariah carey sex tape,  :-DD,

Revision as of 09:18, 14 December 2011

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://onudewnakedfsex.insanejournal.com jenna jameson naked, 310060, http://britneyspearsnudaql.freeforums.org britney spears nuda, tdi, http://hilaryduffnaked2.typepad.com hilary duff naked, 6477, http://keiraknightleynakedxg.tumblr.com keira knightley naked,  :)), http://paolaepe.livejournal.com STANA KATIC HOT, =OO, http://corryemet.livejournal.com CATHERINE BELL NAKED, 44119, http://jacquelinval.livejournal.com LINDSAY LOHAN NUDE PICS, ekwpqc, http://ynudeinakedqsex.insanejournal.com monica bellucci porn, 214, http://bnudexnakedksex.insanejournal.com mariah carey sex tape,  :-DD,