VisWeek V&V: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
added lunch notes |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Britta Weber | * Britta Weber | ||
* Tim Lebo | * Tim Lebo | ||
A few of us met for lunch immediately after the panel, and discussed a few points: | |||
* SIGMOD has had something like it for 2 years, so we can borrow their model. | |||
* Reproducibility takes (uncredited) time and effort; producing unreproducible papers is valued by the community. | |||
* A grad student once published make files behind every published image - but stopped when he got a job. | |||
* Publishing your code (without an established system) provides value because people grab it, use it, remember your name, and cite you in their publications. | |||
Revision as of 15:54, 31 October 2011
At VisWeek 2011, Robert M. Kirby, Claudio T. Silva, Robert S. Laramee, and William Schroeder participated in a panel entitled "Verification in Visualization: Building a Common Culture"
Inspired by the discussions at this panel, the following people would like to organize an effort to facilitate V&V at future VisWeek submissions:
- Britta Weber
- Tim Lebo
A few of us met for lunch immediately after the panel, and discussed a few points:
- SIGMOD has had something like it for 2 years, so we can borrow their model.
- Reproducibility takes (uncredited) time and effort; producing unreproducible papers is valued by the community.
- A grad student once published make files behind every published image - but stopped when he got a job.
- Publishing your code (without an established system) provides value because people grab it, use it, remember your name, and cite you in their publications.