Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 02 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
* Topic should be presented larger and stronger
* Topic should be presented larger and stronger
* The use of different colors for the individual banks could achieve linking with the other graphics
* The use of different colors for the individual banks could achieve linking with the other graphics
[[Image:PercentageGrowth.JPG | 400px]]


==== Residential Mortgages ====
==== Residential Mortgages ====
Line 24: Line 26:
* The x-axes is too low-detailed -> use more details: 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%  
* The x-axes is too low-detailed -> use more details: 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%  
* 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation
* 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation
[[Image:ResidentialMortgages.JPG | 500px]]


==== Bank Deposits ====  
==== Bank Deposits ====  

Revision as of 12:42, 9 December 2009

Aufgabenstellung

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3

Zu verbessernde Grafik


Critics & Good Points


General

  • Good use of low-saturated colors
  • Information is presented in a nice-to-look-at way
  • Wrong visualisation type -> you can't extract the actual information out of this pictures

Percentage Growth

  • Gives a good overview
  • Topic should be presented larger and stronger
  • The use of different colors for the individual banks could achieve linking with the other graphics

Residential Mortgages

  • Reading this graphic is very difficult
  • Layering of the circles is confusing - banks are not related just because they have about the same percentage -> use bar/line charts instead
  • Comments are confusing and need too much space
  • Use colors which banks have been merged, same colors like in the "percentage growth" creates the linking effect
  • The x-axes is too low-detailed -> use more details: 0, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%
  • 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation

Bank Deposits

  • Sense of the graphic is hard to get
  • Circles on the right side don't have any relation to the rest of the graphic
  • The use of a bar or pie chart for the amount of money that is partitioned over the 3 banks would help understanding the graphic