Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
Line 1: Line 1:
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://gvictoriajusticepornr.tumblr.com Victoria Justice Pornkdd, http://bnudeonakedvsex.insanejournal.com Julia Roberts Naked,  seqwqo, http://enudebnakedcsex.insanejournal.com Kirsten Dunst Nude,  8-PP, http://ukareenakapoornudem.tumblr.com Kareena Kapoor Nudeddqz, http://ilindsaylohanx.freeforums.org Lindsay Lohan Tits=-]]], http://aconstancemarien.freeforums.org Constance Marie Nude,  aqtax, http://enudeanakedgsex.insanejournal.com Jessica Simpson Naked>:-))), http://snudeenakedzsex.insanejournal.com Kim Kardashian Sex Scene7551, http://ojessicaalbanakeds.tumblr.com Jessica Alba Naked,  818965, http://mnudednakedysex.insanejournal.com Hilary Duff Naked,  532, http://qnudegnakedcsex.insanejournal.com Sienna Miller Nude,  jum,
It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index., http://zdemimoorec.freeforums.org Demi Moore Naked8-)), http://psofiavergaras.freeforums.org Sofia Vergara Naked,  ljcfo, http://hgemmaartertonnudeo.tumblr.com Gemma Arterton Nude,  =-PPP, http://yjanetjacksonn.freeforums.org Janet Jackson Naked:PPP, http://zcotedepablonudea.tumblr.com Cote De Pablo Nude:-OOO, http://urachelnicholsnudev.tumblr.com Rachel Nichols Nude,  4718, http://qdakotafanningj.freeforums.org Dakota Fanning Nude8-], http://rnudehnakedtsex.insanejournal.com Dakota Fanning Naked:-O, http://qjessicasimpsonh.freeforums.org Jessica Simpson Naked,  :-DDD, http://znudetnakedlsex.insanejournal.com Rachel Weisz Nude,  416,

Revision as of 11:41, 6 March 2012

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index., http://zdemimoorec.freeforums.org Demi Moore Naked, 8-)), http://psofiavergaras.freeforums.org Sofia Vergara Naked, ljcfo, http://hgemmaartertonnudeo.tumblr.com Gemma Arterton Nude, =-PPP, http://yjanetjacksonn.freeforums.org Janet Jackson Naked, :PPP, http://zcotedepablonudea.tumblr.com Cote De Pablo Nude,  :-OOO, http://urachelnicholsnudev.tumblr.com Rachel Nichols Nude, 4718, http://qdakotafanningj.freeforums.org Dakota Fanning Nude, 8-], http://rnudehnakedtsex.insanejournal.com Dakota Fanning Naked,  :-O, http://qjessicasimpsonh.freeforums.org Jessica Simpson Naked,  :-DDD, http://znudetnakedlsex.insanejournal.com Rachel Weisz Nude, 416,