Talk:Data Visualization: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[http://www.google.com/trends?q=information+visualization%2C+data+visualization&ctab=2&geo=all&date=all Google Trend: Information Visualization vs. Data Visualization] | [http://www.google.com/trends?q=information+visualization%2C+data+visualization&ctab=2&geo=all&date=all Google Trend: Information Visualization vs. Data Visualization] | ||
Actually, [Friendly and Denis, 2004] provides a good comparisons among infovis, datavis, and scivis in the "Varieties of data visualization" section under the Introduction section. --[[User:Yijisoo|Yijisoo]] 23:02, 7 June 2006 (CEST) |
Revision as of 22:02, 7 June 2006
Data Visualization vs. Information Visualization
What are the differences between DataVis and InfoVis? Yijisoo
Hard question
Wohoo - that's the one million dollar question I was thinking about many times ;-)
I've found no definition in literature that would point out the differences between the two terms. Anyways, I tried to differentiate the two terms by means of needed semantics for meaningful visualizations:
Data Visualization: Visualization techniques for data represent a set of parameters over time graphically whereas no semantics are needed in order to create a meaningful visualization (e.g., Scatterplot). This also includes simple processing on raw data that do not require semantics (derived data; e.g., Histogram, Boxplot, mean, other statistical measures, clustering, etc.). Furthermore, data visualization techniques are often of static nature.
Information Visualization: In contrast to the previous class, visualization techniques for information need semantics, i.e., the meaning of different parameters and their interrelationships or structure are important in order to create a meaningful representation (e.g., InfoBUG glyph).
What do you think about this definitions?
-- Wolfgang Aigner 09:43, 6 June 2006 (CEST)
Quite possible. I like your distinction. Some publications I found regarding DataVis mostly come from statistics. I am not sure about the interactivity, though. I noticed some DataVis using interactions techniques. I believe that interactivity was added as they are available with the evolution of computer graphic technologies. BTW, the following google trend might be interesting to you. --Yijisoo 21:57, 7 June 2006 (CEST)
Google Trend: Information Visualization vs. Data Visualization
Actually, [Friendly and Denis, 2004] provides a good comparisons among infovis, datavis, and scivis in the "Varieties of data visualization" section under the Introduction section. --Yijisoo 23:02, 7 June 2006 (CEST)