Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
Line 1: Line 1:
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*), http://ashleesimpsonsex.typepad.com ashlee simpson sex, =))), http://brendasongfakes1.typepad.com brenda song fakes, 95839, http://evalongoriaass.typepad.com eva longoria ass,  %-D, http://carlaguginosex.typepad.com carla gugino sex>:(, http://jenniegarthnude.typepad.com jennie garth nude,  =[, http://hollymadisonboobs1.typepad.com holly madison boobs,  392, http://halleberrytits2.typepad.com halle berry titscbees, http://adriennebarbeaunude1.typepad.com adrienne barbeau nuderuj, http://shakiratits.typepad.com shakira tits550,
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://katemossdesnuda.typepad.com kate moss desnudaxao, http://loriloughlinhot.typepad.com lori loughlin hot,  =OO, http://lyndsyfonsecabikini.typepad.com lyndsy fonseca bikini5925, http://diorabairdhot.typepad.com diora baird hotdftbks, http://penelopecruznuda.typepad.com penelope cruz nudalrm,

Revision as of 18:33, 2 December 2011

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://katemossdesnuda.typepad.com kate moss desnuda, xao, http://loriloughlinhot.typepad.com lori loughlin hot, =OO, http://lyndsyfonsecabikini.typepad.com lyndsy fonseca bikini, 5925, http://diorabairdhot.typepad.com diora baird hot, dftbks, http://penelopecruznuda.typepad.com penelope cruz nuda, lrm,