Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
Line 1: Line 1:
That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern' contributors to hone their skills, see their work supplying your site, and give them the tools they need to take your philosophies and understanding out on their own tangents. It might give you a regular supply of fresh, new writers and keep things going while allowing you to step back a little. (If you did go with the intern idea, drop me a line, will you? *g*), http://irinashayktopless.typepad.com irina shayk topless,  %P, http://evagreensex1.typepad.com eva green sex,  kfhb, http://annehathawaysexscenes.typepad.com anne hathaway sex scenes,  436354, http://ninelcondeplayboy.typepad.com ninel conde playboy,  =P, http://katdenningsboobs.typepad.com kat dennings boobs,  89275, http://emiliederavinhot.typepad.com emilie de ravin hot,  jfv, http://keiraknightleydesnuda.typepad.com keira knightley desnuda,  8-O,
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://rachelweiszdesnuda.typepad.com rachel weisz desnuda,  :OOO, http://clemencepoesynude1.typepad.com clemence poesy nude,  ebxdw, http://janetjacksonsextape.typepad.com janet jackson sex tape,  :-DD, http://meganfoxnudephotos.typepad.com megan fox nude photos,  %DDD, http://amypoehlernude.typepad.com amy poehler nude,  8436, http://sonamkapoorboobs.typepad.com sonam kapoor boobs,  olkz, http://monicabelluccipussy.typepad.com monica bellucci pussy,  qlavfe,

Revision as of 05:03, 30 November 2011

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://rachelweiszdesnuda.typepad.com rachel weisz desnuda, :OOO, http://clemencepoesynude1.typepad.com clemence poesy nude, ebxdw, http://janetjacksonsextape.typepad.com janet jackson sex tape,  :-DD, http://meganfoxnudephotos.typepad.com megan fox nude photos, %DDD, http://amypoehlernude.typepad.com amy poehler nude, 8436, http://sonamkapoorboobs.typepad.com sonam kapoor boobs, olkz, http://monicabelluccipussy.typepad.com monica bellucci pussy, qlavfe,

Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Overview-plus-Detail&oldid=73718"