Taxonomy Draft 2: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:07, 11 March 2008

An alternative would be categories used for the InfoVis conference ^[1].

The top level categories are;

This needs to be filled out with sub categories;

Where would the following fit;

What sub-headings would be required?

↑ You can find more detailed descriptions of each of these categories at http://vis.computer.org/VisWeek2008/infovis/papers.html

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Purpose ==
+An alternative would be categories used for the InfoVis conference
+<ref>You can find more detailed descriptions of each of these categories at http://vis.computer.org/VisWeek2008/infovis/papers.html</ref>.
-== Inspirations ==
+The top level categories are;
-== Taxonomy ==
+*Techniques: techniques or algorithms used in infovis
-*Techniques
+*Systems: real or proposed infovis systems
-**Interaction Techniques
+*Design Study: Design choices when applying infovis techniques
-**Representation Techniques
+*Evaluation: ~of infovis visualisations, interfaces or systems
-*Systems
+*Model: theoretical information visualization.
-*Design Study
-*Evaluation
+This needs to be filled out with sub categories;
-*Model
+Where would the following fit;
+# InfoVis software design patterns
+# Dust & Magnet
+# Chi's Data-state reference model
+# Prefuse framework
+What sub-headings would be required?
+==References==
+<references/>
+[[Category:Coffee Room]]
+[[Category:taxonomy]]