Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 11 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Image:guardian.png]]
[[Image:guardian.png]]


Positives
=== Positives ===


    * colours show the regions  
* colours show the regions  


Critique on the existing grafik
=== Critique on the existing graphic ===


    * it is very difficult to interpret
* it is very difficult to interpret
    * there is a growth in carbon emissions of 28 % but this is not shown in the graphic
* there is a growth in carbon emissions of 28 % but this is not shown in the graphic
    * most of the datas in the circles are not assignable to specific countries
* most of the datas in the circles are not assignable to specific countries
    * you can't click on the circles below
* you can't click on the circles below
    * the big dotted circle is expressionless
* the big dotted circle is expressionless
    * you can see the growth in carbon emissions in per cent only at three of the five bigest CO2 producers
* you can see the growth in carbon emissions in per cent only at three of the five bigest CO2 producers
    * the dimension of the circles is expressionless (sometimes bigger circles for low numbers and smaller circles for high numbers)
* the dimension of the circles is expressionless (sometimes bigger circles for low numbers and smaller circles for high numbers)
    * the sum of the numbers from the circles is not the same as the given number of the million tonnes of CO2  
* the sum of the numbers from the circles is not the same as the given number of the million tonnes of CO2  


=== Verbesserte Grafik ===
=== Verbesserte Grafik ===
------------------------------- <br> <br>
------------------------------- <br> <br>
[[Image:Gruppe11Aufgabe3Diagramm.jpg]]
[[Image:Ueberarbeitetegrafikgruppe11.jpg]]
<br> <br>
<br> <br>
[[Image:Gruppe11Aufgabe3Tabelle.jpg]]
[[Image:Gruppe11Aufgabe3Tabelle.jpg]]


Changes
=== Changes ===


    * sum up the several circles to big regions
* sum up the several circles to big regions -> table is more clearly arranged
    * remove the given number of the million tonnes of CO2, the growth in carbon emissions und "Click of the circles below"
* remove the given number of the million tonnes of CO2 (-> irrelevant, does not arise from the graphic), the growth in carbon emissions (-> is not shown in the graphic) und "Click of the circles below" (-> misleading)
    * bar chart instead of the circles
* bar chart instead of the circles -> table is more clearly arranged
    * table with the five top CO2 producers
* table with the five top CO2 producers -> you can compare the countries better
    * no different colours
* no different colours -> not essential

Latest revision as of 01:39, 30 December 2009

Aufgabenstellung[edit]

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3

Zu verbessernde Grafik[edit]




Positives[edit]

  • colours show the regions

Critique on the existing graphic[edit]

  • it is very difficult to interpret
  • there is a growth in carbon emissions of 28 % but this is not shown in the graphic
  • most of the datas in the circles are not assignable to specific countries
  • you can't click on the circles below
  • the big dotted circle is expressionless
  • you can see the growth in carbon emissions in per cent only at three of the five bigest CO2 producers
  • the dimension of the circles is expressionless (sometimes bigger circles for low numbers and smaller circles for high numbers)
  • the sum of the numbers from the circles is not the same as the given number of the million tonnes of CO2

Verbesserte Grafik[edit]






Changes[edit]

  • sum up the several circles to big regions -> table is more clearly arranged
  • remove the given number of the million tonnes of CO2 (-> irrelevant, does not arise from the graphic), the growth in carbon emissions (-> is not shown in the graphic) und "Click of the circles below" (-> misleading)
  • bar chart instead of the circles -> table is more clearly arranged
  • table with the five top CO2 producers -> you can compare the countries better
  • no different colours -> not essential