Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 02 - Aufgabe 3: Difference between revisions

From InfoVis:Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == Aufgabenstellung == [http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/infovis_ue_aufgabe3.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3] === Zu verbessernde Grafik === -----------------...)
 
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
[http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/infovis_ue_aufgabe3.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3]
[http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/infovis_ue_aufgabe3.html Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3]
=== Zu verbessernde Grafik ===
=== Zu verbessernde Grafik ===
------------------------------- <br> <br>
-------------------------------
[[Image:big.gif]]
[[Image:big.gif | 400px]]
 
=== Critics & Good Points ===
-------------------------------
==== General ====
* Good use of low-saturated colors
* Information is presented in a nice-to-look-at way
* Wrong visualisation type -> you can't extract the actual information out of this pictures
 
==== Percentage Growth ====
* Gives a good overview.
* Topic should be presented larger and stronger.
* The use of different colors for the individual banks could achieve linking with the other graphics.
 
[[Image:PercentageGrowth.JPG | 400px]]
 
==== Residential Mortgages ====
* Reading this graphic is very difficult.
* Layering of the circles is confusing - banks are not related just because they have about the same percentage -> use bar/line charts instead, in order to make the chart more understandable.
* Comments are confusing and need too much space, put the comments near the chart.
* Subtract unnecessary non-data ink.
* Use colors which banks have been merged, same colors like in the "percentage growth" creates the linking effect.
* 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation.
* Use hachure effect for 2007 bars, as they are not the current value of the banks. And use the same color for full- and hacured-barrs for each bank in order to observe the ralation between them.
* To highlight the data, use gray color for the other banks which are not as important as these 3 banks, so that the viewer's concentration could focus only on the significant data.
 
[[Image:ResidentialMortgages.JPG | 500px]]
 
==== Bank Deposits ====
* Sense of the graphic is hard to get.
* Circles on the right side don't have any relation to the rest of the graphic.
* The use of a bar or pie chart for the amount of money that is partitioned over the 3 banks would help understanding the graphic.
* Use hachure effect for 2007 bars, as they are not the current value of the banks. And using the same color for full-and hacured-barrs for each bank in order to observe the ralation between them.
 
 
[[Image:Bank_Deposit_V2.JPG | 500px]]
 
== References ==
[Few,2004]: Stephen Few, Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enligthen, Analytics Press, 2004, Chapter 7 - General Design for Communication
 
== Links ==
 
* [[Teaching:TUW_-_UE_InfoVis_WS_2009/10|InfoVis:Wiki UE Homepage]]
 
* [http://ieg.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~gschwand/teaching/infovis_ue_ws09/ UE InfoVis]
 
*[[Teaching:TUW - UE InfoVis WS 2009/10 - Gruppe 02|Gruppe 02]]

Latest revision as of 22:59, 7 January 2010

Aufgabenstellung[edit]

Beschreibung der Aufgabe 3

Zu verbessernde Grafik[edit]

Critics & Good Points[edit]

General[edit]

  • Good use of low-saturated colors
  • Information is presented in a nice-to-look-at way
  • Wrong visualisation type -> you can't extract the actual information out of this pictures

Percentage Growth[edit]

  • Gives a good overview.
  • Topic should be presented larger and stronger.
  • The use of different colors for the individual banks could achieve linking with the other graphics.

Residential Mortgages[edit]

  • Reading this graphic is very difficult.
  • Layering of the circles is confusing - banks are not related just because they have about the same percentage -> use bar/line charts instead, in order to make the chart more understandable.
  • Comments are confusing and need too much space, put the comments near the chart.
  • Subtract unnecessary non-data ink.
  • Use colors which banks have been merged, same colors like in the "percentage growth" creates the linking effect.
  • 2007 and 2009 don't seem very related to each other, maybe this should be combined in one single chart with different color/saturation.
  • Use hachure effect for 2007 bars, as they are not the current value of the banks. And use the same color for full- and hacured-barrs for each bank in order to observe the ralation between them.
  • To highlight the data, use gray color for the other banks which are not as important as these 3 banks, so that the viewer's concentration could focus only on the significant data.

Bank Deposits[edit]

  • Sense of the graphic is hard to get.
  • Circles on the right side don't have any relation to the rest of the graphic.
  • The use of a bar or pie chart for the amount of money that is partitioned over the 3 banks would help understanding the graphic.
  • Use hachure effect for 2007 bars, as they are not the current value of the banks. And using the same color for full-and hacured-barrs for each bank in order to observe the ralation between them.


References[edit]

[Few,2004]: Stephen Few, Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enligthen, Analytics Press, 2004, Chapter 7 - General Design for Communication

Links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/w/index.php?title=Teaching:TUW_-_UE_InfoVis_WS_2009/10_-_Gruppe_02_-_Aufgabe_3&oldid=24013"