Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

15 September 2012

  • curprev 00:0200:02, 15 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,532 bytes −61 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 00:0200:02, 15 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,593 bytes +19 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar

14 September 2012

  • curprev 21:4321:43, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,574 bytes +295 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 21:4321:43, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,279 bytes +87 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 19:1819:18, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,192 bytes −288 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://donaltguzo.livejournal.com/748.html http://donalt
  • curprev 19:1819:18, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,480 bytes +16 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 16:5916:59, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,464 bytes −241 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://malakaicawe.livejournal.com/1338.html http://mala
  • curprev 16:5616:56, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,705 bytes +193 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 14:3014:30, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,512 bytes −98 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 14:2714:27, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,610 bytes +217 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 12:0512:05, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,393 bytes +11 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 11:5811:58, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,382 bytes −154 In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 10:0110:01, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,536 bytes +358 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 09:5209:52, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,178 bytes −222 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 07:3707:37, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,400 bytes +78 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 07:3007:30, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,322 bytes −144 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 05:2905:29, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,466 bytes +93 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 05:2405:24, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,373 bytes +115 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://pieferget.livejournal.com/1349.html http://pieferget.livej
  • curprev 03:0103:01, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,258 bytes +65 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 02:5902:59, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,193 bytes −165 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://jamnisona.livejournal.com/1464.html http://jamnis
  • curprev 00:3900:39, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,358 bytes −246 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 00:3100:31, 14 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,604 bytes +256 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v

13 September 2012

  • curprev 22:1422:14, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,348 bytes +233 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 22:0322:03, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,115 bytes −642 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://omuradog.livejournal.com/1537.html http:/
  • curprev 19:5919:59, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,757 bytes +187 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 19:4819:48, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,570 bytes −131 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 17:3917:39, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,701 bytes +529 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 17:2217:22, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,172 bytes −242 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 15:1615:16, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,414 bytes −252 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 15:0315:03, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,666 bytes +467 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 13:0013:00, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,199 bytes −228 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 12:4512:45, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,427 bytes −46 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 10:3810:38, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,473 bytes +179 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 08:1508:15, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,294 bytes −200 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://domellakoq.livejournal.com/1093.html http://domellakoq.liv
  • curprev 07:5507:55, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,494 bytes +138 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://ultanaver.livejournal.com/551.html http://ultanav
  • curprev 06:0606:06, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,356 bytes −237 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 05:4805:48, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,593 bytes +207 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 03:4303:43, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,386 bytes −24 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 03:2403:24, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,410 bytes −103 It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 01:1601:16, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,513 bytes +25 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 01:0001:00, 13 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,488 bytes +211 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://edmundausoz.livejournal.com/578.html http

12 September 2012

  • curprev 22:5322:53, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,277 bytes −496 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 22:3922:39, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,773 bytes +299 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 20:2720:27, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,474 bytes +168 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 18:0718:07, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,306 bytes +116 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 17:5817:58, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,190 bytes −272 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://idolasicar.livejournal.com/1182.html http://idolasi
  • curprev 15:3915:39, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,462 bytes +202 ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 15:3215:32, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,260 bytes −202 In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 13:2513:25, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,462 bytes +66 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 13:1513:15, 12 September 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,396 bytes +32 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://alejandrolyd.livejournal.com/1621.html http://aleja
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"