Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 June 2012

  • curprev 16:5816:58, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,149 bytes +179‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 16:2516:25, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 970 bytes −78‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 16:0716:07, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,048 bytes −154‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 15:3315:33, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,202 bytes +96‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 14:4214:42, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,106 bytes −23‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://dailybooth.com/kenard
  • curprev 14:2414:24, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,129 bytes −171‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://dailybooth.com/dautafuni1989/26385271 ELIZABETH T
  • curprev 13:4913:49, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,300 bytes +3‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 13:3313:33, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,297 bytes −62‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 12:5512:55, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,359 bytes +103‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 12:4012:40, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,256 bytes −187‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 12:0112:01, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,443 bytes +57‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 11:4411:44, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,386 bytes +285‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 11:0611:06, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,101 bytes −217‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 10:4810:48, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,318 bytes +347‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 10:0610:06, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 971 bytes −17‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 09:5409:54, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 988 bytes −204‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://dailybooth.com/dechil
  • curprev 09:1009:10, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,192 bytes −42‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 09:0309:03, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,234 bytes −191‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 08:1508:15, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,425 bytes +214‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 08:1208:12, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,211 bytes +109‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 07:2107:21, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,102 bytes +116‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 07:1907:19, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 986 bytes −51‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 06:3006:30, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,037 bytes −327‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://dailybooth.com/munseabalback1983/25931224 ANNA GU
  • curprev 06:2506:25, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,364 bytes +402‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 05:3905:39, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 962 bytes −280‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 05:3405:34, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,242 bytes −93‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 04:4904:49, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,335 bytes +272‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 04:4404:44, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,063 bytes −171‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 03:5803:58, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,234 bytes −202‎ I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:
  • curprev 03:5503:55, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,436 bytes +427‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 03:1203:12, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,009 bytes −443‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://dailybooth.com/ziokidcompri1974/26272508
  • curprev 03:0603:06, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,452 bytes +164‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 02:2602:26, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,288 bytes +29‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 02:1702:17, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,259 bytes +137‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 01:4101:41, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,122 bytes +1‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 00:5600:56, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,121 bytes +155‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://dailybooth.com/patceirinet1988/26090561 LUCY PINDER NAKED,
  • curprev 00:1000:10, 23 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 966 bytes −153‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only

22 June 2012

  • curprev 23:1823:18, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,119 bytes −113‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 22:2722:27, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,232 bytes −66‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 21:3621:36, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,298 bytes +219‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 20:4420:44, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,079 bytes −13‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 19:5619:56, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,092 bytes +76‎ Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 19:1119:11, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,016 bytes −325‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 18:2618:26, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,341 bytes +256‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 17:4117:41, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,085 bytes +52‎ And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 16:5516:55, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,033 bytes −151‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://dailybooth.com/ovewemfoot1970/26403835 JESSICA AL
  • curprev 16:0816:08, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,184 bytes +6‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 15:2015:20, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,178 bytes +271‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 09:2709:27, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 907 bytes −60‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 09:0209:02, 22 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 967 bytes +66‎ I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"