Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 June 2012

  • curprev 04:0204:02, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,007 bytes −114‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 03:1703:17, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,121 bytes +18‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 03:1503:15, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,103 bytes −161‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 02:2902:29, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,264 bytes +86‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 02:2802:28, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,178 bytes −243‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 01:4201:42, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,421 bytes +74‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 01:4101:41, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,347 bytes +210‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 00:5400:54, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,137 bytes +255‎ Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 00:5300:53, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 882 bytes −85‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 00:0700:07, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 967 bytes +65‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 00:0600:06, 19 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 902 bytes −529‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment

18 June 2012

  • curprev 23:2023:20, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,431 bytes +187‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 23:2023:20, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,244 bytes +204‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 22:3322:33, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,040 bytes −81‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 21:4521:45, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,121 bytes −448‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 20:5820:58, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,569 bytes +600‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 20:5720:57, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 969 bytes −344‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 20:1120:11, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,313 bytes +200‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 20:1020:10, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,113 bytes +45‎ Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 19:2419:24, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,068 bytes −86‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 19:2419:24, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,154 bytes +56‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 18:3718:37, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,098 bytes −367‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 18:3518:35, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,465 bytes +377‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 17:5017:50, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,088 bytes −98‎ I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 17:4917:49, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,186 bytes +170‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 17:0217:02, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,016 bytes −314‎ It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://www.flickr.com/people/79705581@N08/ RACHEL WEISZ
  • curprev 17:0117:01, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,330 bytes +139‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 16:1416:14, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,191 bytes −118‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 16:1216:12, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,309 bytes +413‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 15:2315:23, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 896 bytes −98‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://aa656wtgin68imrxq97p.freeforums.org GEMMA ARTERTON DESNUDA,
  • curprev 15:2115:21, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 994 bytes −23‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://ftzuxcyvz4yrkvifsf8f.freeforums.org CHRISTINA AGUIL
  • curprev 14:3414:34, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,017 bytes −65‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://w
  • curprev 14:2914:29, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,082 bytes −110‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 13:4313:43, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,192 bytes −130‎ And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 13:3913:39, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,322 bytes +297‎ And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 12:5312:53, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,025 bytes +60‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 12:4812:48, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 965 bytes −315‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://w9xnudelzp.posterous.com DENISE MILANI HO
  • curprev 11:5611:56, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,280 bytes +131‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 11:1011:10, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,149 bytes −125‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 11:0311:03, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,274 bytes +126‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 10:2210:22, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,148 bytes +267‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 10:1510:15, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 881 bytes −305‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://j1cnudebqonaked.mywapblog.com KRISTEN BELL DESNUDA,
  • curprev 09:3409:34, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,186 bytes −51‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 09:2909:29, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,237 bytes +164‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 08:4808:48, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,073 bytes −375‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 08:4308:43, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,448 bytes +584‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 08:0108:01, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 864 bytes −43‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 07:5707:57, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 907 bytes −146‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://0jenniferlovehewitttitsj.tumblr.com JENNIFER LOVE
  • curprev 07:1507:15, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,053 bytes −13‎ Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://exp7s550y0n1xve5k9ib.freeforums.org ANGELINA JOLIE PUSSY,
  • curprev 07:1007:10, 18 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,066 bytes −151‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"