Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 June 2012

  • curprev 03:0203:02, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,007 bytes −114 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 02:1702:17, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,121 bytes +18 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 02:1502:15, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,103 bytes −161 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 01:2901:29, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,264 bytes +86 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 01:2801:28, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,178 bytes −243 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 00:4200:42, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,421 bytes +74 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 00:4100:41, 19 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,347 bytes +210 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'

18 June 2012

  • curprev 23:5423:54, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,137 bytes +255 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 23:5323:53, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 882 bytes −85 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 23:0723:07, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 967 bytes +65 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 23:0623:06, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 902 bytes −529 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 22:2022:20, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,431 bytes +187 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 22:2022:20, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,244 bytes +204 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 21:3321:33, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,040 bytes −81 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 20:4520:45, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,121 bytes −448 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 19:5819:58, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,569 bytes +600 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 19:5719:57, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 969 bytes −344 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 19:1119:11, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,313 bytes +200 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 19:1019:10, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,113 bytes +45 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 18:2418:24, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,068 bytes −86 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 18:2418:24, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,154 bytes +56 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 17:3717:37, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,098 bytes −367 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 17:3517:35, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,465 bytes +377 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 16:5016:50, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,088 bytes −98 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 16:4916:49, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,186 bytes +170 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 16:0216:02, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,016 bytes −314 It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), http://www.flickr.com/people/79705581@N08/ RACHEL WEISZ
  • curprev 16:0116:01, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,330 bytes +139 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 15:1415:14, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,191 bytes −118 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 15:1215:12, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,309 bytes +413 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 14:2314:23, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 896 bytes −98 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://aa656wtgin68imrxq97p.freeforums.org GEMMA ARTERTON DESNUDA,
  • curprev 14:2114:21, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 994 bytes −23 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://ftzuxcyvz4yrkvifsf8f.freeforums.org CHRISTINA AGUIL
  • curprev 13:3413:34, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,017 bytes −65 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://w
  • curprev 13:2913:29, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,082 bytes −110 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 12:4312:43, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,192 bytes −130 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 12:3912:39, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,322 bytes +297 And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 11:5311:53, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,025 bytes +60 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 11:4811:48, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 965 bytes −315 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://w9xnudelzp.posterous.com DENISE MILANI HO
  • curprev 10:5610:56, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,280 bytes +131 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 10:1010:10, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,149 bytes −125 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 10:0310:03, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,274 bytes +126 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 09:2209:22, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,148 bytes +267 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 09:1509:15, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 881 bytes −305 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://j1cnudebqonaked.mywapblog.com KRISTEN BELL DESNUDA,
  • curprev 08:3408:34, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,186 bytes −51 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 08:2908:29, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,237 bytes +164 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 07:4807:48, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,073 bytes −375 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 07:4307:43, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,448 bytes +584 That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 07:0107:01, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 864 bytes −43 The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 06:5706:57, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 907 bytes −146 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://0jenniferlovehewitttitsj.tumblr.com JENNIFER LOVE
  • curprev 06:1506:15, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,053 bytes −13 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://exp7s550y0n1xve5k9ib.freeforums.org ANGELINA JOLIE PUSSY,
  • curprev 06:1006:10, 18 June 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,066 bytes −151 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"