Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 June 2012

  • curprev 07:3507:35, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,449 bytes +261‎ Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 07:0607:06, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,188 bytes +160‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 06:5106:51, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,028 bytes −351‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 06:2306:23, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,379 bytes +323‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 06:0706:07, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,056 bytes +44‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 05:4005:40, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,012 bytes −32‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 05:2305:23, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,044 bytes −143‎ Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://7nudevnakedgsex.insanejournal.com SOFIA VERGARA TOP
  • curprev 04:5404:54, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,187 bytes +332‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 04:3904:39, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 855 bytes −306‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://4nude5naked5sex.insan
  • curprev 04:1104:11, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,161 bytes +292‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 03:5603:56, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 869 bytes −272‎ I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://cnudeknaked4sex.insan
  • curprev 03:2603:26, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,141 bytes +65‎ Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 03:1103:11, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,076 bytes −164‎ And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is
  • curprev 02:3802:38, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,240 bytes +305‎ In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create
  • curprev 02:2502:25, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 935 bytes −80‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 01:5101:51, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,015 bytes −240‎ Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 01:3601:36, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,255 bytes −82‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 01:0701:07, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,337 bytes +159‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 00:5000:50, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,178 bytes +35‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 00:2400:24, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,143 bytes −65‎ Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
  • curprev 00:0500:05, 8 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,208 bytes +10‎ What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT

7 June 2012

  • curprev 23:4023:40, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,198 bytes +149‎ Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 23:2123:21, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,049 bytes +15‎ I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 22:5622:56, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,034 bytes +62‎ ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug
  • curprev 22:3722:37, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 972 bytes −121‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 22:1222:12, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,093 bytes +62‎ I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 21:5221:52, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,031 bytes +104‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 21:2821:28, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 927 bytes −371‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://s
  • curprev 21:0921:09, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,298 bytes +63‎ It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 20:4420:44, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,235 bytes +178‎ One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 20:2420:24, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,057 bytes −91‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 19:5819:58, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,148 bytes −303‎ I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 19:3919:39, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,451 bytes +246‎ That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern'
  • curprev 19:1419:14, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,205 bytes +299‎ It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t
  • curprev 18:5418:54, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 906 bytes −41‎ In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread
  • curprev 18:3018:30, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 947 bytes −218‎ O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://lnudeznakedesex.insanejournal.com JENNIFER TAYLOR
  • curprev 18:0918:09, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,165 bytes −80‎ Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://b
  • curprev 17:4517:45, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,245 bytes +234‎ Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 17:2517:25, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,011 bytes −132‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 17:0117:01, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,143 bytes +293‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://knudeenakedlsex.insanejournal.com MARIAH
  • curprev 16:3816:38, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 850 bytes −314‎ Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://0nude6nakedpsex.insanejournal.com KELLY P
  • curprev 16:1516:15, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,164 bytes −34‎ That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 15:5415:54, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,198 bytes +71‎ I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 15:2815:28, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,127 bytes +210‎ I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 15:0915:09, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 917 bytes −16‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 14:4214:42, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 933 bytes −317‎ The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only
  • curprev 14:2414:24, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,250 bytes +91‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 13:5513:55, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,159 bytes +11‎ It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 13:3913:39, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.51 talk‎ 1,148 bytes −101‎ I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 13:0913:09, 7 June 2012‎ 46.21.144.52 talk‎ 1,249 bytes +184‎ I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"