Talk:Overview-plus-Detail: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

2 April 2012

  • curprev 22:5222:52, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,068 bytes +71 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 22:3022:30, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 997 bytes −179 Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://snudeanakedusex.insanejournal.com julianne moore nu
  • curprev 22:1922:19, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,176 bytes −100 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 21:5721:57, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,276 bytes −188 That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.
  • curprev 21:4521:45, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,464 bytes +423 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 21:2121:21, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,041 bytes −78 I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion
  • curprev 21:1021:10, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,119 bytes −35 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 20:4820:48, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,154 bytes −74 I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33754874 megan fox nud
  • curprev 20:3520:35, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,228 bytes +45 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 20:1320:13, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,183 bytes +34 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 20:0020:00, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,149 bytes −34 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 19:4019:40, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,183 bytes −134 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 19:2719:27, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,317 bytes +170 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 19:0519:05, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,147 bytes +116 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 18:5318:53, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,031 bytes +114 Just look at the difference just 20-30 rock solid Tea Party conservatives have made in the House already. They've turned "1/3 of the government" on its head and started a war between the establishment
  • curprev 18:3118:31, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 917 bytes −444 Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33746
  • curprev 18:1918:19, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,361 bytes +281 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 17:5717:57, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,080 bytes −187 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 17:4417:44, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,267 bytes −147 Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's
  • curprev 17:2317:23, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,414 bytes +203 Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in
  • curprev 17:0917:09, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,211 bytes +17 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 16:5016:50, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,194 bytes +52 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 16:3616:36, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,142 bytes +103 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 16:1616:16, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,039 bytes +89 Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.), http://s
  • curprev 16:0316:03, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 950 bytes −419 I do think that by working in a team, it will make it easier for you. The passion moves away from you and to the team of writers, the hate will move with it. Being a part of a groupblog would be a goo
  • curprev 15:4115:41, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,369 bytes +92 It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange
  • curprev 15:2915:29, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,277 bytes +106 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 14:5414:54, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,171 bytes +77 What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT
  • curprev 14:3114:31, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,094 bytes +54 Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and
  • curprev 14:2314:23, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,040 bytes +91 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 13:5613:56, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 949 bytes +30 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33754782 lindsay lohan
  • curprev 13:4813:48, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 919 bytes −178 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 13:2213:22, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,097 bytes −71 One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v
  • curprev 13:1313:13, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,168 bytes +34 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33754863 meag
  • curprev 12:4812:48, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,134 bytes +169 I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac
  • curprev 12:4012:40, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 965 bytes −72 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 12:1412:14, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,037 bytes −5 It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo
  • curprev 12:0412:04, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,042 bytes +157 I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://www.esnips.com/displa
  • curprev 11:4211:42, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 885 bytes −299 O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://mnudeonakedbsex.insanejournal.com eve torres nude
  • curprev 11:2711:27, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,184 bytes −111 Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i
  • curprev 11:0811:08, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,295 bytes +394 I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about
  • curprev 10:5210:52, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 901 bytes −280 I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney
  • curprev 10:3510:35, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,181 bytes −219 I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie
  • curprev 10:1610:16, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,400 bytes +177 I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But
  • curprev 10:0210:02, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,223 bytes +153 I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as
  • curprev 09:4209:42, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,070 bytes −29 I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom
  • curprev 09:2909:29, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 1,099 bytes −46 Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast
  • curprev 09:0609:06, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,145 bytes +219 Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is
  • curprev 08:5708:57, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.51 talk 926 bytes −330 Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://tnudeinakedfsex.insanejournal.com britney spears sex tape,
  • curprev 08:3108:31, 2 April 2012 46.21.144.52 talk 1,256 bytes +79 Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar
(newest | oldest) View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://infovis-wiki.net/wiki/Talk:Overview-plus-Detail"